Book Title: Concept of Pancasila in Indian Thaought
Author(s): Kamla Jain
Publisher: P V Research Institute Varanasi

Previous | Next

Page 164
________________ Celibacy and Chastity 149 ing the offences, the categorizing appears less scientific; for it appears to a general reader of the Vinaya that sometimes a very severe offence is placed in a minor category such as dukkața or pâcittiya, while a very trivial offence which possesses only a ritualistic significance is included in the higher or rigorous section. As, for example, the use of a decomposed corpse to quench the blind and impatient sex desire is only a dukkața offence, while touching the hair of a woman or praising her beauty is considered to be samghädisesa offence. So far, in the discussion, only the Bhikkhu Pātimokkha is referred to, but in the Bhikkhuni Pātimokkha the precept and its violation are discussed independently and even with more cautiousness. Actually on the ground of this precept only the distinction between the Bhikkhu and the Bhikkhuni Pātimokkha appears to have been made, otherwise the differences in the two codes are almost negligible. The rules regarding nuns however are even more rigid than those regarding the monks; as for example the samghādisesa of monks might amount to the pārājika of the nuns. The reason for this is only that women occupied an inferior position in Buddhist community as compared with men. But so far as the legal proceedings of the offences and the transgressions of the precepts are concerned there does not exist much basic difference. Therefore it is not very necessary to discuss all these offences again. The ideal for both Bhikkhus and Bhikkhuņis lay in leading a chaste life, which is intrinsically one and the same for both. 1. When a man holds the hand of a nun out of lust, but nun does not get annoyed on this and does not try to run away, on the other hand she enjoys his company, talks with him and goes to a lonely place with him, she is accused of Pārājika offence. --Bhikkhuņi Pātimokkha On the other hand, in the case of a monk it would be counted as a Samghādisesa offence only. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290