Book Title: Arhat Parshva and Dharnendra Nexus
Author(s): M A Dhaky
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 33
________________ THE TEACHINGS OF ARHAT PĀRÁVA AND THE DISTINCTNESS OF HIS SECT Sagarmal Jain Among the Nirgrantha Tirthankaras, the historicity of Arhat Pārsva as well as of Jina Vardhamana Mahāvīra has been fully established. Inscriptional and literary evidence play an important role in establishing the historicity of a person. The earliest inscription relating to Pārsva, of the 2nd or 3rd century A.D.,' has been found from the Kankāli Țilā, Mathurā. It is inscribed on an image of Pārsva which was installed by Ghosaka, a disciple of Gani Aggahiniya of the Sthāniya-kula of the Kottiya-gana, a sub-order of friars and nuns also noticed in the hagiological list (earlier part, c. A.D. 100) of the Paryusaņā-kalpa (compiled c. A.D. 503/516). Though uninscribed, a more than life size sculpture of Pārsva (upper part mutilated)3 and a tiny figure of Pārśva as the central focus of an āyāgapatta, both stylistically datable to the period of the saka king Sodas (c. early 2nd cent. A.D.)," prove that Arhat Pārsva was venerated in, and arguably before, that period. A metal image of Pārśva in the Prince of Wales Museum, variously dated between the 2nd-1st cent. B.C. to c. 2nd cent. A.D., is one more early piece in evidence. The inscriptional as well as the literary references to the Nirgranthas, however, are met with from c. third century B.C. The term "Niggantha" is mentioned in the inscription of Maurya Aśoka and is fairly frequently met with in the Pāli Tripitaka (usually, of course, in hateful and denegatory terms) though this cannot be taken as a conclusive evidence for the earlier church of Pärśva because the term Niggantha by then also had included the sect of Mahāvīra. In point of fact, the Pāli canon confounded a few views and teachings of these two historical Tirthankaras. As demonstrated in the early days of the Nirgranthic researches by Jacobi,8 in the Tripitaka it is said that Niggantha Nātaputta (Mahāvīra) preached căturyama-samvara, while in point of fact the preacher of the căturyāma-dharma was Arhat Pārsva and not Mahāvīra according to the Ardhamāgadhi canon of the Nirgranthas themselves.' Mahāvīra preached five-fold great vows (pañca-mahāvratas) and not the căturyāmasaṁvara. What we today can know about the teachings of Arhat Părśva and the distinctness of his sect from that of Jina Vardhamāna is only through the available Ardhamāgadhi Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204