Book Title: Some Problems in Jaina Psychology
Author(s): T G Kalghatgi
Publisher: Karnatak University Dharwar

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 38
________________ MIND IN JAINISM 21 The material composition of the mind was not uncommon in the philosophies of the East and West alike. In the Brhadāranyakopanişad, mind was looked upon as material. Upanişadic philosophers supposed that mind for its formation depends on alimentation'. It is supposed to be manufactured out of the food that we take (Annamayan manah hi somya manah). Food takes three different forms: the heaviest becomes excrement, the medium quality becomes flesh, and the subtlest part becomes mind, just as the churning of curds gives the subtlest which is butter.33 Later, in the days of Bhagavadgitā, the three temparaments rajas, tamas and sattva were recognized, and they were due to different kinds of food. This may be compared to the modern theory of temperament as depending on the secretion of glands. Therefore, pure food was desirable. The quality of food influenced the quality of mind. In Chandog yopanişad, it is said that when food is pure, the whole nature becomes pure, memory becomes firm...... 34 In the Nyāya theory it is contended that mind, being an additional sense organ, need not be structurally different from the other sense organs. An atom of earth, water or air can, without any logical inconsistency, be credited with the function of mind. Similarly, it cannot be distinguished from ākāśa.35 There has been a controversy between the Naiyāyikas and the Mimāṁsakas about the material size of the mind. The Naiyāyikas believed that mind is atomic in size. Otherwise there would be simulatneous cognition of different things. The impossibility of cognition was referred to in the Brhadāranyakopanisad, "my mind was elsewhere, I could not see..." as quoted earlier. But the Mimāṁsakas hold that mind is unlimited in size. The Vedāntins believe that mind is a created substance devoid of any parts and it must be of medium size, (madhyama parimāna). According to Sāṁkhya Yoga, in the process of evolution, owing to disturbance in the balance of the gunas, buddhi, ahamkāra and manas are gradually evolved. They are jada in nature. Hiriyanna says that, according to this view, the functions that we describe as mental are really mechanical processes of the physical organism, which assume a psychical character only when illuminated by the spirit.36 In the Vedānta also the antaḥkaraṇa is looked upon as bhautika, composed of five elements wherein tejas predominates. Such a description of the non-sentient (jada) aspect of mind is endorsed by the modern theories of mind based on the study of the evolution of behaviour from the primordial amoeba. "The fundamental feature of behaviour is irritability and conductivity, with the specialization of structures sensitive to the different forms of energy in nature. There arises the nervous system which not only 33 Chandogyopanişad, Vol. V, and VI. 1-234 Op. cit Vol. VII. 26. 2. 35 Bhaduri (8): Nyāya Vaišeșika Conception of Mind, as appearing in B.C. Law Volume. 36 Hiriyanna: Outlines of Indian Philosophy, p. 285. Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org wm

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205