Book Title: Political History Of Ancient India
Author(s): Hemchandra Raychaudhari
Publisher: University of Calcutta

Previous | Next

Page 440
________________ RELATIONSHIP OF THE SĀTAVĀHANAS 411 but merely Andhra-bhrityas, servants of the Andhras, successor is distinctly referred to even in these Purānas as the son of a predecessor (cf. the cases not only of the first Sri śātakarni but also of Satakarni II, Lambodara, and even Yajña Sri-( DKA, p. 39, fn. 40, 44; p. 42, fn. 12.). The use of the expression tato (DKA, 39) in the Matsya Purāna to indicate the relationship between sātakarņi I and Pūrņotsanga when taken along with the words tasyāpi Pūrnotsangah (Vishnu IV. 24. 12) and Paurnamāsastu tat sūtah (Bhāg. XII. 1. 21) leaves no room for doubt that Purāņic evidence represents Pūrņotsanga-Paurņamāsa, as the son and immediate successor of Sātakarņi I and not a 'distant' offspring or a remote offshoot of a 'cross-cousin marriage', who got the throne by the rule of matrilineal succession. There may be no valid reason as asserted by Mr. Chattopādhyāya for identifying him with Vediśri of the Nānāghāt record. But the reading Vediśri as pointed out by K. Šāstri is wrong. The proper reading is Khandasiri = Skandasri. This prince has been plausibly identified with Pārņotsanga's successor, the fifth king of the Purāņic list. It is, therefore, difficult to agree with the view (JASB, 1939, 325) that the prince in question (the so-called Vediśri) 'never came to the throne'. Pūrņotsanga may have been some other 'kumāra'. Cf., the nameless prince (kumāra) 'sātavāhana' of the Nānāghāt record who is mentioned along with 'Hakusiri' (Saktisri). It is also to be noted that even the so-called older version of the Matsya speaks of only 19 kings in one passage. The Gautamīputras and the Vāsishthiputras did not rule over distinct regions. Gautamiputra Satakarņi is represented as the Rājā of Mülaka, ie, the district round Paithan, along with other territories. Pulumāvi, too, ruled over Paithan as we learn from the Geography of Ptolemy. The epithets "Vijha......... Malaya-Mahida......pavata pati" and "tisamudatoyapita-vāhana' applied to Gautamiputra suggest that he was as much entitled to the designation Dakshiņāpathapati as his son. The statement that, except for the third king, the royal title and relationship to the mother went together, is not borne out by recorded facts. In the Myākadoni Inscription, for example (Ep. Ind., XIV. pp. 153 ff.), we have the passage-Raño Satavahanānan s (í) ri-Pulum(a)visa without any mention of the metronymic. Cf. also the passage Raño Sirichada-sātisa (Rapson, Andhra Coins, p 32). As to cross-cousin marriages, several recorded cases, e.g., those of the wives of Sri Satakarni I and Vāsishthiputra Sri-Satakarni of the Kanheri Inscription, do not support the theory propounded by Mr. Chattopadhyāya. The kings in question may, doubtless, have been polygamous. But that the extra queens, if any, included.cousins is only a guess. The marriages actually hinted at in the epigraphic records of the sātavābanas (unlike those of the Ikshvākus) are not of the cross-cousin' type. Indian history knows of cases where a queen or other royal personage takes as much pride in the mother's family as in that of the father (cf. ubhayakulalankārabhūtā Prabhāvati, JASB, 1924. 58). Does Nāyanikā lay any claim to a sātavāhana origin? The table of cross-cousin marriage on p. 325 of JASB, 1939 would make Śātakarņi (No. 6 of the list) a brother of

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714