Book Title: Political History Of Ancient India
Author(s): Hemchandra Raychaudhari
Publisher: University of Calcutta

Previous | Next

Page 498
________________ • THE DATE OF KANISHKA'S CHAPLAIN 469 (South) Kośala (in the Upper Deccan). Lastly, the catalogues of the Chinese Tripitaka state that An-Shih-Kão ( 148-170 A.D.) translated the Mārgabhūmi Sūtra of Sangharaksha who was the chaplain of Kanishka.? This shows conclusively that Kanishka flourished before 170 A.D.3 The arguments against the theory of Dr. Majumdar are equally applicable to the surmise of Sir R. G. Bhandarkar who placed Kanishka's accession in A.D. 278. 4. According to Fergusson, Oldenberg, Thomas, Banerji, Rapson and many other scholars. Kanishka was the founder of that reckoning commencing A.D. 78, which came to be known as the Saka era. This view is not accepted by Prof. Jouveau-Dubreuil on the following grounds : 1 Rājatarangini, I. 173 ; Harsha-charita (Cowell). p.252 ; Watters, YuanChwang. II, p. 200. The epithet trisanudrādhipati which the Harsha-charita (Book VIII) applies to the śātavāhana friend of Nāgārjuna cannot fail to remind one of Gautamiputra śātakarpi 'whose chargers drank the water of the three oceans' (tisamudatoyapitavāhana), or one of his immediate successors. 2 Eliot, Hinduism and Buddhism, II, p. 64n. Bunyiu Nanjio's Catalogue, App. II, 4. 3 According to the theory of Dr. Majumdar, Vāsudeva I ruled from (249+74) 323 to (249 +98) 347 A.D. But Chinese evidence places a Poutiao (Vasudeva ? in 230 A.D. The Khalatse Ins. also presents difficulties. 4 For the origin of the Saka era see Fleet, CII., preface 56; JRAS, 1913, pp. 635, 650, 987 ff. ; Dubreuil, A. H. D., 26; Rapson Andhra Coins, p. cv; S. Konow, Corpus, II. i. xvi f. Nahapāna, who was not even a Mahākshatrapa in the years 42-45, and who never became a paramount sovereign, could not possibly have been the founder of the era. The theory which represents Nahapana as the founder of the era used in his inscriptions (dated 42-46) is also contradicted by a Jaina tradition (relied on by Sten Konow, Corpus, II. i. xxxviii) which assigns to him (Nahavāhana) a period of only 40 years. Chashtana has no better claims and the evidence of the Periplus shows that he could not have ruled at Ujjain in 78 A.D. As to the theory that Kadphises II founded the reckoning in question, it may be pointed out that no inscription or coin of this monarch contains any date which is referable to an era of his institution. The only Scythian king who did establish an era in the sense that he used a regnal reckoning that was continued by his successors, is Kanishka. And the only reckoning that is attributed by Indian writers, since the days of the early Chalukyas, to a Scythian king is the Saka era of 78 A.D. (contd.)

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714