________________
KAVIKAUSTUBAA
the plot of the play. In this stz. Jenna is to be supplied in the first half and जायते in the second. Hence the क्रियाव्यस्तदोष.
19, 1. 1. EFT:e in metres i. 0. stanzas. peftrara-This clause is obscure in meaning. It may be thus explained --3751 50 SET 378 . अर्थलक्ष्यस्य गोचरत्वं आश्रयत्वेन विषयत्वं तेन हीनत्वात्. A sentence (वाक्य) is the support of the meaning (37727 a faturd) and it is the meth, the indicator of the meaning, and the sense is the 78t or is indicated by the qot. Now a verb is the principal part of a sentence. Cf. आख्यातं (verb) साव्ययकारकविशेषणं वाक्यं (for ref. see 14 above). As the verb is omitted in these verses, they are said to be characterised by the f97ezte.
20. agit arises when there is a lack of the natural or proper order in mentioning things. diftrat etc. Here the correct order of discription is-bath, worship of deities, bowing down to preceptors or elders and taking food. But this is violated in fa5791... Ji and therefore arises the pela fault. This stz. is closely similar to a CET 2.22 - 3747 94 प्रसिद्धक्रमलङ्घनम् । यथा भुक्त्वा कृतस्नानो गुरून्देवांश्च वन्दते ॥ Also ef. भुक्त्वा स्नात्वा च देवानश्चति which is given as an instance of अक्रम in वाग्भट'S काव्यानुशासन ( NSP edn. p. 28).
20, 1. 1. 79T - T est or star ahim is an Astronomical work dealing with the gas and was written by stara (about 1039 A.D.). It is commented upon in Marathi by the author himself and by #74 in Sanskrit. For further particulars, see S. B. Dikshit's Hist. of Ind. Astronomy (in Marathi. Poona, 2nd edn. 1991.) pp. 470 f.; V. L. Bhave, HERITARFE (Poona, 1919) pp. 208.; S. Chitrava, Azeria RETTE (Poona, 1937) p. 785; and Bhärata Itihāsa Samsodhana Mandala, Poona, 2nd Anual Report, pp. 81-117 (here a Ms. of the ph with author's #Riot com. is described and long extracts from the com. are given ).
21. Constru : faf architar: afritsta 47 (FT Firefoot) Paris प्रभवविरतिमध्यज्ञानवन्ध्याः (वतेन्ते) तं इह विश्वजन्मात्ययानां निमित्तं, भग्रहै: अनुमितं, ईशंकालं वन्दे
Here the क्रमहीनदोष arises due to the expression प्रभवविरतिमध्यज्ञानवन्ध्याः which should have been a falangrer:.
21, 1. 1. This linve explains how the fault Pagarises in the above. stz. FTTT ... TFH910, fora, existence becomes impossible if (fata=) g immediately follows the (729 = ) 34fl, origination.
22. This stanza describes an incident in the hunting expedition of Dasaratha. Here the Eat arises because in the fourth line, instead of the regular formation पातयामास, पातयां प्रथममास is used, i.e. पातयामास is ungrammatically split up into two by the interposing of between qati and 31.917THF is the periphrastic perfect fr. q causal, formed by P. 3.1.35,
TEHETTIAHT Pafè, and P. 3.1.40, and for, according to which no word can come between 31-and the perfect forms of , ( 317 or ). SISTA, however, has used such irregular construction twice more viz. R. 13.36, TTAT 1 754 चकार and R. 16.86, संयोजयां विधिवदास समेाबन्धुः. Though some commentators try to defend this construction of Ericain (see Vandargikar's edn. of Raghuvams'a, Notes pp. 186f.) Jñanendra sarasvati, in his azalfenidaar on facrament on FFITTO ) clearly states that these are mistakes. Read - af 9174
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
