________________
274
EPIGRAPHIA INDICA.
[VoL.XXIIL.
+ श्रीसीलाहारनरेंद्रजीमूतवाहनान्वयप्रसूतसमस्तराजाव5 लीसमलंचतमहामण्डलस(ख)राधिपतिथीमद(द)हरिपालदेव6 कवाणविजयराज्ये । तबसादावाप्तसमस्तमंडलचिन्ताभा7 () समुहहति श्रीवसुपडवल ।' तथा महाप्रधान बोलम(स)ण8 प्रभो । तथा महाप्रधान श्रीपसि(शिव राउल 1 तथा प्रधान वास. 9 गिनायक । सत्येतस्मिन् काले प्रवर्तमाने । बोसू(शू)ोरक10 सवहारग्रामप्रभू(भु)ज्यमान्(न)मा[प्रधा[नधीपाहवमनदेवेन । 11 श्रीगोवईभटउपाध्याय च दिवाकरभट उपाध्यासुत (ब)चदेव12 भट उपाध्ये ।' महापर्वणि उतगण' संक्रांतिसमये धर्मेण उदकपू13 बक(क)।' पटकील रानानक पानेवडिसि(शि)वाय प्रदत्त[:]।' पाचंद्रार्क14 तारक जावतु तिष्ठति मेदिनी केनापि --' वा(बा)धा न करणीया ।' 15 अपार्थे साक्षि बहारग्रामप्रमुख रिसिम्हतारा ।' तथा साधि नागुजिम्ह16 तारा। तथा साचि अनंतनायक। साचि चांगदेव म्हत(ता)र----
C.-Bassein Stone Inscription of Mallikarjuna : Saka 1083, This inscription is reported to have been brought from Bassein, and it is briefly noticed in the Bombay Gazetteer. The stone measures 3' 53' by 1'61' and the inscribed portion 14' by 14". It contained 18 lines, but, now, the last line is almost illegible. Below the inscribed portion, in a rectangle there is a representation of the ass-curse similar to that noticed before, though it is much worn out. At the top, between the inscribed portion and the figures of the Sun and the Moon, in & rectangle there are two figures and between them are two one big and the other
1 Stop indicated by two dots which look like the visarga sign.
: The last syllable of this line and the first of the next are not clear. [Reading may be Stil Stü)rppärakack-d). ntarggulu.-Ed.]
. May stand for Govardhana as suggested by Bhagwanlal Indraji (Bomb. Gaz., Vol. I, Pt. ii, p. 19, n. 3). (TO me the reading appears to be Gõvanna-bhata-upadhyā ya]-suta-Divakara, eto. In this case the donee would be only Brahmadēva.-Ed.)
• Read Uttarayana. . [Reading seems to be Anévadi-sid (ddh)-aya. See p. 273, n. 3, above.-Ed.] • Read -larakanyāvat. * These two letters are not clear. • The last syllable is not clear; it looks like kaha.
Stop indicated by two dots which look like the visarga siga. 10 Read ad.kahi. 11 This portion of the line is not clear.
11 Bomb. Gaz., Vol. XIII, Pt. ii, p.428,n.42 Vol. XIV, p. 388 and Vol. I. Pt. ii, p. 20,n.15 see also above. Vol. VII, Appendix, p. 56, n. 4. Altekar, (op. cit., Vol. II, p. 416) calls this the Chiplan stone inscription. But tbis inscription is dated, according to Kielhorn, in Sala 1078 (+), Dhätri Samvatsara, Vaisakha Suddha s. Tuesday. See above, Vol. VII, Appendix, p. 56, No. 311, and Bomb. Gaz., Vol. I, Pt. ii, p. 19, and Vol. XIV. B.380. So the inscription that Altekar seems to have " traced" in the P.W.M.in the Bassein stone insorip. tion atul not the one from Chiplun.
