________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.org
Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir
શ્રી અતરિક્ષ પાનાચ∞ તી.
hands of the Swetambaris, had been in fact usurped by the servants of the temple, known as Polkars, who for many years had exercised independent control and had become "perfect masters of the situation " as the learned Trial Judge expressed it. They set their employers at defiance, and, to consolidate their own position, tried to play off the Digambaris against the Swetambaris. They also maltreated and plundered the pilgrims. The two sects united to face a common enemy, and in order to deprive the Polkars of the powers they had usurped, the Digambaris, at the instance of the Swetambaris, agreed to co-operate, with the result that in May 1901, a joint committee of equal numbers of Swetambaris and Digambaris was formed to undertake the management of all affairs, the prime mover in the arrangement on behalf of the Swetambaris having apparently been Kalyanchand Lalchand one of the present respondents.
४७
This committce, acting on behalf of both sects, joined in instituting criminal proceedings against the Polkars, who, as a result, were reduced to the position of servants of both. It was clearly the view of the learned Trial Judge, not dissented from on appeal, that but for the aid of the Digambaris then rendered, and but for the monetary assistance then provided by them, the temple and all contrrol over it would have been lost to both sects.
For Private And Personal Use Only
This made all the more significant the proceedings at a general meeting of the Jains in 1905, at which, the Joint Committee still being in management, there was framed a scheme whereby the worship of the idol was to be performed by both sects in turns according to a regular time--table, which allocated precisely the same length of time for worship to each sect. The result, as held by both Courts, was that for the further period between the ejectment of the Polkars and the quarrel over the plastering of the idol in 1908, the two sects managed the temple through their committee, and worship was carried on by each sect in accordance with its own ceremonies and observances as prescribed by the time-table propounded in 1905. And, in the view of the learned Trial Judge, these arrangements set at rest all disputes as to worship and as to the management of the Samsthan so far as the peculiarities of their worship and devotion went, and they practically
