Book Title: Studies in Buddhist and Jaina Monachism
Author(s): Nand Kishor Prasad
Publisher: Research Institute of Prakrit Jainology & Ahimsa Mujjaffarpur

Previous | Next

Page 157
________________ 136 STUDIES ÎN BUDDHIST AND JAINA MONACHISM To keep extra robes after taking up of the store of robes(kathinuddhāra)' was regarded as an aberration of the monastic discipline.' If anybody possessed a spare robe, it was to be given either to a needy monks or to one's parents'. Anybody acting against these rules ought to be dealt with according to the law." (o) The size of the robes The size of the robes to be used by a Buddhist must be smaller than that of the Buddha which normally was four and half cubits in length and three cubits in breadth. This was perhaps the size of the uttarā sanga. In this connection it is remarkable that the text, which even prescribes the size of kandupaticcha dil and vassikas ātika as two cubits by one cubit, and three cubits by one and half cubits respectively, fails to give any size of the antaravā saka and the sanghāti, two of the three main robes allowed to the mendicants. It was lue to the reason that their size differed according to the size of the individuals. Before making any reference to the size of the robes to be used by the Jaina ascetics, it will not be improper to remark that neither th Angas nor the Mūlasūtras contain a complete information about the size of the robes. According to the Acārā ngasūtra, one of the four robes allowed to the nuns should be two cubits broad, the other two, three cubits broad and the fourth, four cubits broad. This information of the Acara ngasūtra which omits the length of the robes is again partially supplemented by the Oghaniryukti" which gives the length, perhaps of the first robe, as two and half cubits. Thus neither the Buddhist nor the Jaina sources are complete in details as regards the size of the robes. In absence of complete information, it is however difficult to make any categorical remark. Anyway, it may be concluded that the standard size of the clothing was that which was required to cover that portion of the body on which it was worn, 1. Vinaya Texts (SBE. Vol. XIII), p. 19 fn. 2. MV, 8. 16. 22, p. 305. 3. Ibid, 8. 19. 36, p. 313. 4. Ibid, 8. 16. 22, p. 305. 5. PM, 5. 92. 6. Ibid, 5.90. 7. Ibid, 5.91. 8. Op. cit. 2. 5. 1. I (p. 157); Thān, 246, p. 186b. 9. Op. cit. 705, p. 213b.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306