Book Title: Studies in Buddhist and Jaina Monachism
Author(s): Nand Kishor Prasad
Publisher: Research Institute of Prakrit Jainology & Ahimsa Mujjaffarpur

Previous | Next

Page 244
________________ THE LAWS OF POLITY 223 As these groups of Prayaścittas form the subject matter of the following section, here we must confine to some important and relevant observations only. Absolution from the first six types of offences was sought either by confession or by self-imposed penance. The confession as well as the penance was practised before the gurū who gave necessary directions in this respect. The punishment prescribed for the first of the last four Prayascittas was curtailment "of a part of the monk's ecclesiastical rank among his brethren, which dates from his second reception, the definitive consecration to the vow."2 The minimum cut enforced was five days which was determined by the status of the guilty person in the Church hierarchy. Besides, the loss (Cheda) was also determined, like the period of Samodha naparivāsa of the Buddhists, by the period during which the offences were repeated. It was called Santară Gheda. The next, that is Parihara, the purification of the transgressor by isolation lasted for one month, or for four months 4 or for six months". The person undergoing the penalty was subjected more or less to social boycott. It may roughly be compared with th Parivāsa of the Buddhists.? The complete loss of the ecclesiastical rank is termed Mala. The person sub poena is required to get himself re-admitted in the order punaruratopasthapana). After the complete loss of the ecclesiastical rank, the transgressor is suspended from the ecclesiastical rights and privileges and placed on probation so that he may qualify himseif for re-admission. This probationary period is krown as Anavatthappa which seems partially identical to Parivasa prescribed for heretics by the Buddhists. Jo Commission of a grave offence led to expulsion (Parañciyal from the Order for ever. Other measures taken by the later Jainas were that they imposed upon the transgressor expiatory fasts whose duration varied according ; HJM, pp.3.50-82; H7M ; to Aup, p. 78 1. Ţ hān, p. 484a. 2. Indian Antiquary, 39, p. 262, fn. 25; Comm. to Aup, p. 78. 3. Vav, Uddesaka I; Jiyakappa, 80-82; HJM, pp. 235f; Appendix I. 4. Vav, Uddesaka I; HJM, pp. 236, Appendix I. 5. Vav, Uddesaka I. 6. Vav, 2.28-30. 7. Vide Infra, pp. 232-34. 8. Comm. to Aup. p. 78; Jiyakappa, 83-86. 9. HJM, p. 237. 10. Vide Supra, pp. 95-6.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306