________________
Jaina Theory of Atoms : 243
36. A. K. Jain : In Tulasi Prajñā, Jaina Vishvabharati, Ladnun,
12.1, 1986, p. 74. 37. Muni, Mahendrakumar 11 : In S. C. D. Felicitation Volume,
pp. 4-7. 38. Shankara Mishra : Vaišeşika-sūtra-upaskāra, p. 371. 39. K. C. Lalwani : Bhagavati-Sūtra-1 (English Translation ),
pp. 139-142. 40. Kundakunda : Pravacana-sāra, pp. 207-209. 41. Umāsvāmi : Tattvārtha-Sūtra, Varni Granthamala, Kashi,
1970, p. 108. 42. Pūjyapāda : Sarvārtha-siddhi, Bharatiya Jnanapitha, Delhi,
1971, p. 219. 43. Ācārya, Puspadanta & Bhūtabali : Satkhaņdāgama, Book
14, pp. 30-32. 44. Amritacandra Sūri : Tattvārtha-sāra, Varni Granthamala,
Kashi, 1970, p. 108. 45. N. L. Jain : Griha Vijñāna Rasāyana, Ram Prasad & Sons,
Agra, 1985, pp. 32-33. 46. P. Ray : Indian Journal of History of Science, 1.1.1966. 47. B. V. Subbarayappa : Ibid, p. 19. 48. Anuyogadvāra-sūtra, A. P. S., Beawar, 1987, p. 250. 49. Bhagavati-sūtra, p.2885. 50. Ibid, p. 2846. 51. Post-script : Arhat Vacana, 1995 postulates a new mean
ing to the Jaina Theory of Bonding indicating that aphorismic meaning of bonding due to 'snigdha and ruksa' should mean three types of bondings — (i) Snigdha - Snigdha, (ii) Ruksa -- Ruksa and (iii) Snigdha - Rukșa. This does not seem to be right as there is only singular number in the aphorism. This will also have repercussions on the following aphorisms in this regard. Secondly, one is also not right to say that bondings specified in literature refer only to electrovalent linkage.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
