Kavyanushasana Critical Study

Author(s): A N Upadhye
Publisher: A N Upadhye

Page 15

158
161
Hemachandra's Refutation of Antidhvani Views -Reviewed and Summarized
141 Statement and Suggestion : How Are They Related
143 The Range of The suggested sense demonstated
148 Hemachandra Ignores The Drift-power
149 The Arthi Vyañjanā
151 Peculiar Factors Analysed
152 Divisions of The Suggested Sense
154 Sabdaśaktimālā Vyañjanā Defined
156 Abhidhāmālā and Lakşaņāmālā Vyañjanā
156 Why Divide Vyañjana Into śabdi and Arthi ?
156 Suggetiesvness of Word as well as Sense
157 Vyañjanā Belongs To Both Sabda and Artha
158 What Is Abhidhamūlā Vyañjana ? The Problem of Homonyms
159 The Restrictive Circumstances
159 The Motive Factor In Laksaņā Is Always Suggested Abhidhamūla and Laksaņāmālā : Both śabdi
162 The Function of Perception
162 Neither Abhidhā Nor Laksaņā Can Convey The Prayojana 163 Refutation of Dvitiyalakşaņāvāda and Visistalaksaņāvāda Factors That Affect The Arthivyañjanā
166 The Śabdaśaktimüladhvani and slesa : Their Provinces Hemachandra Illustrates Types of Dhvani
169 Arthasaktimülavyangya Defined
174 Hemachandra's Criticism of Mammața's Threefold Arthasakti mūladhvani
174 Hemachandra's Treatment of Arthasaktimüladhvani Compared with Ānandavardhana's and Mammata's
175 Classification of Arthasaktimüla Unjustified
175 Hemachandra's Independent Stand on Division of Arthasaktimuladhvani
176 Kavipraudhokti Explained
177 The Poet's Imagination Is All-Informing
178 Hemachandra's Concern With True Aesthetics
180
Lauda
163
167
XIV