Jain Journal 1994 01

Author(s): Jain Bhawan Publication
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication

Page 12

112
JAIN JOURNAL
in the angas je ime rai-"sara-talavara-koḍambiya954-maḍambiya-ibhaseṭṭhi-seṇāvai-satthavāhapabhiio.955 The kuppavayaniyam describes in the following enumeration the character of those sects which do not share the Jaina belief je ime956 caraga-ciriya-cammakhamdiyabhicchamḍaga-pamḍuraṁga
Goyama-govvaiya-gihidhamma-dhammacim-[27] taga-aviruddha-viruddha-vuḍḍhasävagapabhiyao pāsaṁḍatthā, and states that these Imdassa va Khamdassa va Ruddassa va Sivassa va Vesamaṇassa vā devassa vā nāgassa vä jakkhassa vā bhūyassa va Mugumdassa va Ayyãe vā Koṭṭakiriyāe va957 uvalevaṇa-sammayyaṇā-" varisaṇadhūvapupphagamdhamallaiyaim davvāvassayāiṁ karemti. The loguttariam finally is referred to the merely external Jaina-yogin je ime samanagunamukka-jogi cakkāyaniraṇukampa haya iva uddāmā gayā iva niramkusa ghaṭṭhā maṭṭhā tuppoṭṭhā958 pamḍurapaḍapāuraṇī959 jiņāņam aṇāṇāe (anäjñayā) sacchaṁdam vihariūnaṁ ubhayo-kālam āvassagassa uvaṭṭhaṁti.
954 On talavara, see p 38 fg. 313; koḍambiya from kutamba, the older form of kutumba, see Ind. Streifen I, 284. Pancadandacch. p. 41: yasya pārśvata asannam aparam gramanagarädikam nā 'sti tat sarvataśchinnajanāśraya-vise sarupam maḍambam ucyate tasya 'dhipatir māḍambikaḥ.
muhadhoyana-damtapakkhalana-tella-phaniha-siddhatthaya-hariyaliya-addāga
955
dhuva-puppha-mallagamdha-tambolavattha-m-aiyaim davvavassayaim karemti tao paccha rayakulam va devakulam va sabham vā pavam (prapām?) vā ārāmaṁ vă uyyāṇam vā niggacchamti.
956 dhati(?) vahakaḥ samto ye bhikşam caramti te carakah; rathyapatitaciraparidhanas cirikaḥ; carmaparidhanas carmakhandikaḥ, ye bhikṣām eva bhumjate na tu svaparig hitam godugdhadikam te bhikṣaṭaḥ, Sugataśasanastha ity anye; pamduramga bhasmoddhulit agatrah,vicitrapadapatanādiśik şakalapayuktavaratakamulikadicarcitayṛṣabhakopäyataḥ (?) kanabhikṣagrahino Gautamath; cf. Kanabhuj, Kanāda) gocaryanukarino govratikah, te hi "vayam api kila tiryakṣu vasāma' iti bhavanam bhavayamto gobhir nirgacchamtibiḥ saha nirgacchamti sthitabhis tisthamti asinābhir upavisamti bhumjānābhis tathai 'va tinapattrapaus paphaladi bhum jate, tad ukiam gavihi samam niggamapavesathāṇāsanai pakarimti | bhumjamti jahā gāvi tiricchavasam vibhavamtā ||; grhasthadharma eva śreyan iti... gthidharmas, tatha ca tadanusärinam vacaḥ gṛhasramasama dharmo na bhuto na bhavisyati tam palayamti ye dhirah, klivah paṣamḍam asrita iti ||); Yajnavalkyaprabhṛtirsipraṇītadharmasamhitas cimtayamti.. dharmacimtakah; devatakṣitisamätäpity-tiryagādinām avirodhena vinayakaritvad aviruddha vainayikāḥ; punyapapaparalokadyanabhyupagamapara akriyavadino viruddha(h), sarvapāṣamdibhiḥ saha viruddhacaritvät; prathamam era "dyatirthakarakale samutpannatvāt. prayo vyddhakale dikṣapratipatteś ca vyddhas tapasāḥ; śravakaḥ brāhmaṇaḥ anye ta vyddhaśravaka ity ekam eva padam vrahmanavacakatvena vyacakṣate (Buddha is therefore not referred to here! (see Bhag. 2,214); and AC2 R read vuddha, BC alone having vuddha); pāṣamdam vratam, tatra tisthamti 'ti pāṣamḍasthāh; on Goyama fg. see Aupap. § 73. See chap. 15 in Varahamihira's Brhajjataka (pravrajyayogadhyaya), or Laghujat. 9, 12). Ind. Stud. 2 287, where also viddhasravaka.
957 Mukumdo Baladevah; Arya prasamtarupa Durga; sai 'va mahişarudha tat
kuṭfanapara Kottakriya; atro 'pacarad imdrādiśabdena tad-ayatanam apy ucyate; the same arrangement of the gods, except Mukunda, occurs also in the Bhagavati. 3, 1, 66; see my treatise 2, 113, 1,439.
958 See p. 161 on Häla 459 Bhuv.
959 According to all appearance this speaks against the connection of the text with the Svetambaras and refers it to the Digambars [cf. Bhag. 2, 187n, 321, where I have partially misunderstood the passage].