Book Title: ISJS Jainism Study Notes E5 Vol 03
Author(s): International School for Jain Studies
Publisher: International School for Jain Studies

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 185
________________ karmas, bonded with the soul, can be in ten states15. Most of these states, except the last one, can be changed to suit the owner by following strenuous ethico-spiritual code of conduct. This doctrine can be utilized to explain the alternate systems of medicine (life style based on earning auspicious karmas, stoppage and annihilation of karmas) and use of medicines (allopathic, homeopathy, āyurvedic etc. Ethical considerations Ethics deals with right and wrong, good and bad, and ought to do 16. Here the question that confronts us is this: How to determine according to Jainism, what is morally right for a certain agent in a certain situation? Or what is the criterion of the rightness of action? The interrelated question is what we ought to do in a certain situation or how duty is to be determined? The answer of Jain ethics is that right, ought and duty cannot be separated from the good. The equivalent expression in Jain ethics for the term 'right' and 'good' is śubha / auspicious. The criterion of what is right etc. is the greater balance of good over bad that is brought into being than any alternative. Jain ethics holds the teleological theory of right (Maximum balance of non-violence (Ahimsā) over violence (Himsā) as the right-making characteristic). Does Jain ethics subscribe to act-approach or rule-approach in deciding the rightness or wrongness of actions. Even though Jain preceptors (Ācāryas) have given us moral rules, yet in principle they have followed that every action is to be judged on the goodness of the consequences expected to be produced. This means that Jain ethics accepts the possibility that sometimes these general moral principles may be inadequate to the complexities of the situation and in this case a direct consideration of the particular action without reference to general principles is necessary. This implies that Jain ethics does not allow superstitious rule-worship but at the same time, prescribes that utmost caution is to be taken in breaking the rule, which has been built up and tested by the experience of generations. Example is the unintentional killing of insects due to the walking of a Jain monk who exercises all 15 Bandha or bondage, Sattā or existence, Udaya or activation/realization, Udiraņā or premature fruition, Udvartana or increasing the duration and/or intensity of the karma, Apavartana or reducing the duration of existence and activity, Sankramaņa or interchange of nature, Upaśama or subsidence, Nidhatti or immunization of karmas against certain external activities and Nikācana or immunization of karmas against all external activities. 16 Prof K. C. Sogani in his paper on 'Religion and morality' in Study Notes of ISIS Page 172 of 273 STUDY NOTES version 5.0

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292