Book Title: ISJS Jainism Study Notes E5 Vol 01
Author(s): International School for Jain Studies
Publisher: International School for Jain Studies

Previous | Next

Page 107
________________ SCHOOL TIONAL OF SELF STUDY IS THE SUPREME AUSTERITY, स्वाध्याय परमं तप STUDIES hook or crook to prevent people from going to other monks. They sow the seeds of fraction in their families. In the "Hundis", one of 181 "bolas" and another of 306, Acārya Bhikṣu have presented a full account of the loose conduct among sadhus. In Bhiksu's time the following beliefs and practices were current. Even the garb or semblance of lord Mahāvīra was to be saluted. It was believed that this particular time i.e. Pañcamakāla is not conducive for spiritual upliftment and therefore the rules prescribed were relaxed tremendously. There was a growing belief in "mixed religion" where one and the same act is regarded as sinful and meritorious. For example, the act of temple building involves violence of one sensed souls at the same time it leads it leads to the religious merit. No discrimination was made between worldly pity and donation from spiritual compassion and donation, to take food prepared for him, to use articles purchased for a monk, to take food everyday from the same house. Not to inspect clothes and utensils so as to avoid any injury to insects', to initiate a householder without permission from his guardians to keep clothes and utensils beyond measure to make householders prepare copies for their personal use. Bhiksu wrote 1st lekhapatra in V.S.1832 from the point of view of the campaign for purity in conduct. Acharya Mahaprajna mentions the following main points: "Many people say that there can be no religion without killing creatures. They hold that there is no sin if one's thought is pure. But how can the thoughts of those who intentionally kill be pure? He said that where there is pity, there could be no religion without killing creatures. Violence is man's weakness, and that there can be no religion without violence is completely ominous. It is no religion to preserve a creature by killing another. Religion is to exhort the irreligious to adopt religious ways. To nourish creatures by killing others is the worldly way those who sense religion they are an ignorant lot. Many people say that if creatures are killed with a sense of pity the result is both religion and sin. But sin does not lead to religion and religion does not lead to sin. There cannot be both in the same sense. Sinful and religious actions are necessarily different. Page 94 of 317 STUDY NOTES version 5.0

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352