Book Title: ISJS Jainism Study Notes E5 Vol 01
Author(s): International School for Jain Studies
Publisher: International School for Jain Studies

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 105
________________ SCHOOL TIONAL OF ध्याय परम SELF STUDY IS THE SUPREME AUSTERITY, AN STUDIES राप impossible to lead life of a true monk. Bhikhanji, unsatisfied with the answer, left his Guru, in the town of Bagdi in Marwar State (Rajasthan). Agreeing with Lonka, who protested against the religious practice of offering worship to the images, Bhiksu contented that the Acaryas of the Middle Ages wrote commentaries in which they interpolated the principles of image worship and devotional religion as a means of self purification on the path of salvation. The Acaryas also interpolated in the commentaries their own views on benevolence emphasizing the worth of charity and social service as indispensable acts for the accumulation of punya or merit leading to a higher spiritual life. Bhikhan asserted that charity and social service are not helpful to the path of freedom. 3.1 Literature Unlike Lonka, Bhiksu has lot of literary work to his credit. His works are also available to us. He has written a treatise on nine tattvas, a poem on anukampa, on dayā, dāna, ahimsā, on the conduct of the monks etc. Bhikhanji in his book, "Acārā-ri-coppayi" has strongly criticized the food habits of Sthānakavāsī monks. According to him, many of them, especially the senior monks consumed excessive quantities of food ignoring the needs of other monks who were junior to them. The monks, who distributed food, discriminated between the recipients. Bhikhanji's primary charge against the monks was that they ate excessive food and undertook fasts with the single objective of enjoying delicious food, which they got from laymen. V.G. Nair, a critique of Bhiksu, in his book "Jainism and Terapanthism" says "Bhikhanji's allegation goes to show that he was not probably given sufficient quantity of food to appease his hunger either because of the less quantity of alms which the sadhus could collect from lay devotees in consequences of the food famine that prevailed in Marwar or it may be that Bhikhanji was deprived of a portion of his legitimate share in punishment for his reactionary views on Jainism and his outburst against the Samgha. It seems that the problem of discriminated food distribution among the sadhus was the primary cause of his revolt and departure from the sthānaka."4 Muni Nathamal (presently known as Acārya Mahāprajña) in his book Acarya Bhiksu: The Man and His Philosophy writes "neither Raghunathji nor Bhiksu ever imagined that the Jain 4 V.G.Nair, Jainism and Terapanthism, p. 22 Page 92 of 317 STUDY NOTES version 5.0

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352