Book Title: Comprehensive History Of Jainism
Author(s): Aseem Kumar Chatterjee
Publisher: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt Ltd

Previous | Next

Page 116
________________ 90 A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF JAINISM the celebrated city of Vidiśā. We have two Jaina image inscriptions both of which are now preserved in the local museum at Vidiśā. 82 These are not only important for the history of Jainism but also in the political history of the Gupta period. Both these inscriptions refer to 'Mahārājādhirāja Rāmagupta'. As the title indicates, this Rāmagupta was a paramount sovereign and not merely a local ruler Coins of Rāmagupta are already known.83 In the official Gupta records the name of Rāmagupta is understandably absent. The play Devicandragupta of Visakhadatta, which is preserved only in fragments, delineates Rāmagupta as the successor of Samudragupta, and a weak monarch who did not hesitate to offer his wife to the Saka king of Ujjayini. His younger brother Candragupta, by a clever stratagem, succeeded in killing the Saka king. 81 Later, we are told, he also killed his brother and married his wife Dhruvadevi. The discovery of the Jaina inscriptions testify that Rāmagupta is not a product of the imagination but Samudragupta's actual successor We have already referred to his coins, and now these inscriptions engraved on the pedestals of Puspadanta and Candraprabha show that he was responsible for the construction of those images of the Jaina Tīrthamkaras. This he did on the advice of Celukșamaņa, the son of Golakyāntā and pupil of Acārya Sarppasena Ksamana, the grand-pupil of Candra Kşamācārya-kşamaņa-śramana, who was a pānipātrika, i.e., one who used the hollows of his palms as an alms and drinking bowl. The celebrated śivārya, the author of the Bhagavatī-ārādhanā, as we will see later, calls himself pāņidalabhoi, which probably indicates that like him Candra was a Digambara monk. 85 This inscription, therefore, indicates that Rāmagupta had some genuine respect for the Jainas. The characters of the inscriptions agree closely with that of the Allahabad prasasti and I am not aware of the existence of any other Mahārajādhiraja Rāmagupta of the fourth century AD. Another inscription 6 found from Udaygiri near Vidiśā and dated in the year 106 of the Gupta era corresponding to AD 426 of the reign of Kumāragupta refers to the erection of an image of Pārsva by Sankara, a disciple of Gośarman, who was a disciple of Bhadrācārya of Aryakula. The inscriptions of the time of Rāmagupta, Kumāragupta's uncle, as we have already seen testifies to the popularity of Jainism in the Vidišā region. Sankara, we further learn from the same inscription, was formerly a warrior but later accepted the Jaina religion. These inscriptions go far to prove that Vidiśā was a

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360