________________
198
A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF JAINISM
215. See also The Classical Age, p. 260. 173. See EI, XXVII, pp. 203 ff.; also Nellore Inscriptions, p. 676. 174. Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy, 1968–9, p. 60 and no. B. 219. 175. Loc. cit. 176. Loc. cit. see also B. 220. 177. See ibid., p. 6. 178. Ibid., B. 268. 179. Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy, 1954–5, B. 360. 180. Ibid., 1968–9, B. 221. 181. See The Age of Imperial Kanauj, pp. 165 ff. 182. See Seminar on Inscriptions, Madras, p. 159. 183. Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy, 1968–9, B. 223. 184. See Rangacharya, op. cit., Salem, 81. 185. See EI, X, pp. 54 ff. 186. Ibid., p. 64. 187. Loc. cit. 188. SII, IX, pt. 1, no. 19. 189. See E!, X, p. 70. 190. Ibid., p. 65. 191. Ibid., p. 68. 192. See EI, IV, pp. 141 ff. 193. See SII, III, pt. 3, no. 92; XIII, no. 245. 194. Annual Report on South Indian Epigraphy, 1909, App. B. 82. 195. SII, III, pt. 3, no. 91. 196. Annual Report on South Indian Epigraphy, 1907, no. 199. 197. See SII, XIX, no. 80. 198. Ibid., no. 51. 199. Ibid., p. 25. 200. Ibid., XIII, no. 297. 201. Ibid., XIX, no. 89; also pt. 3, no. 97 and AR, of 1907, no. 66. 202. See SII, I, no. 68. 203. Annual Report on South Indian Epigraphy, 1900, App. B. 53. 204. Annual Report on Indian Epigraphy, 1961-2, pp. 4–5; see also Transac
tions of the Archaeological Society of South India, 1958–9, pp. 84 ff. 205. SII, II (no. 76), p. 387. 206. 201 of 1902 (Annual Report on Epigraphy, Madras). 207. EI, 4, p. 137. 208. Travancore Archaeological Series, I, pp. 193 ff.; see also Rangacharya,
op. cit., Tiruvankur, 2. 209. Rangacharya has followed the chronology proposed by K.A.N. Sastri
in The Pandyan Kingdom, pp. 36 ff. 210. Annual Report on Epigraphy (Madras), 1914, 430–31. 211. See Desai, op. cit., p. 62. 212. See SII, XIV, no. 22; see also EI, 32, pp. 337 ff.
