Book Title: Comprehensive History Of Jainism
Author(s): Aseem Kumar Chatterjee
Publisher: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt Ltd

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 168
________________ A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF JAINISM 59 records the grant of a piece of land to a Jaina savant called Aparajita, who is described as the disciple of Sumati, and a grand-disciple of Mallavādi, belonging to the Sena Samgha branch of the Müla Samgha. According to the Digambara Paṭṭāvalis, Müla Samgha branched off into three subsections known as Deva Samgha, Nandi Samgha and Sena Samgha. This inscription, therefore, confirms the veracity of the testimony of the Paṭṭāvalis. I have already mentioned in connection with my discussion of south Indian Jainism that Nandi Samgha was in existence in the far south even as early as the sixth century AD. It appears that within a few years of the emergence of the Digambara sect it was subdivided into a number of smaller schools, both in the north and the south. The field which was granted to Aparajita in the Śaka year 743 is described in the inscription as situated near Nāgasārikā (modern Navsari, 20 miles south of Surat) which was one of the greatest cities of ancient Gujarat. The grant was made for the purpose of daily worship, cooked rice offerings, and repairs and renovation of the monastery (vasatikā) which is described as an ornament of Sambapura and was attached to the temple of Arhat situated within the boundaries of Śrī Nāgasārikā. There is no doubt that the temple of Arhat at Nāgasārikā, mentioned in his inscription, was built before the eighth century AD. The last two verses of the inscription are in praise of the Jina and the religion preached by him. The donor Karkarāja Suvarnavarṣa was a cousin of the Raṣṭrakūta emperor Amoghavarṣa I and was a feudatory under him in the Gujarat region. It appears that this branch of the Raṣṭrakūta family, like the main branch, actively patronized the Jainas, but today there is no trace of any Digambara temple at Navsari. There is however a Śvetämbara shrine which was built in the thirteenth century." 142 Jaina inscriptions before AD 1000 are extremely rare in Gujarat. We have just discussed the Surat plates of Karkarāja. A few epigraphs of Girnar were probably inscribed before AD 1000. The only other significant Jaina inscription is that known as Varuṇāśarmaka grant dated in vs 1033 corresponding to AD 975. It was issued during the reign of Mūlarāja I by his son yuvaraja Camuṇḍarāja. We are told that the latter granted a field for the benefit of a Jaina temple at Varuṇāśarmaka which is identified with Vadasama in Mehsana district of eastern Gujarat. The inscription significantly refers to jinabhavana and jinabimba. This shows that the early kings of the Caulukya dynasty of Gujarat were not against Jainism, but we cannot

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360