Book Title: Aspects of Brahmanical Influence On Jaina Mythology
Author(s): Shaktidhar Jha
Publisher: Bharat Bharti Bhandar

Previous | Next

Page 125
________________ Dyrastic Luls and Genealogical Accounts joj Now, it will not be unrcasonablc to statc that onc of the motives behind this revised and recast representation of the Solar and thc Lunar dynastics might have bcen its aiming at thc purging of thcsc dynastics from their divine origin, ascribed by the Brahmanical cpic-Puranic tradition to the godheads Sürya and Candra respectivcly But a closc study of the Jaina accounts reveals that the way, in which the rationalization has been cllccted, is far from being sausfactory, for more than onc rcason First, the names in question are stated to have oned their origin to such persons who, as the Jaina accounts show, have nothing to their crcdit in the uni. versal development. They appear insignificant both on spiritual and mundanc planes and look like pigmies before the towering personality of their fathers and grandfather. Sccondly, Bharata, father of Adityayasas, having been rep. rescnicd as the first universal monarch ol matchless prowess and Bahubalın, Somayaśas, father, having been portrayed as the Caramasarırın of immense physical and spiritual strength, it would have been logical to namc thc respcctive lines aftcr Bharala and Bahubalın rather than after their uninspiring sons. Furthermore, the unpac! of the Brahmanical tradition 15 so profound that in spic of thc Jinistrcprcscntation of the above lines as sub-branches of the Ikşvāku race, it 15 only thc Adulyatamsa which finds mcntion as the Iksvaku or Aikşvāka race, and so far as we know, nowhere in the works under investigation the gencric term Ikşvāku has cver been applied to the Somavamsa whose claim to that title, according to these versions, should have been as strong as that of the Āduyavamsa Under the circumstances, it is not extraordinary that the majority95 of thc Digambara Purānakāras parted company with their brethren in their dynastic and , gencalogical scheme and represented the Somavamsa as distinct from the Iksvaku dynasty and identical with the Kuru line Notwithstanding the aforesaid incongruity and discrepancy, the representation of the Adityavamsa and Somavamsa as 08 Jinasena II, Gunabhadra, Puşpadanta and śubhacandra

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315