Sambodhi 1983 Vol 12

Author(s): Dalsukh Malvania, H C Bhayani, Nagin J Shah
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad

Page 15

Ram Murti Saima ins. th. oli, ?: --Imposition of ical uil unlund meal on real lakes place. Here again anises the problem of the substratum of the Adhyāsa of Animui, o Ātman As some scholars obsei ve, is it Antahkarana or Ind ? Intahkarana can not be the substratuin of Anātman because it is
ci Analnan. Therefore, the Adlvartin, Sankara explains that Patyagitm.i, the interior self is the substratum on which the attributes of
CH1 onguns and the Internal organ and other anālman objects are superimposed
37.14677. Yanacaf
* $189748964 d o
39.71747-417. / ...v7h 98102-4at9fa471.. 9N1AT4 walifandi calamuma: omfatto
2014
(B.S.S.B Intioduction)
Therefore it becomes clear that the substialum of the Anatman objects is Ämman and not the Antahkarana. It also proves that the subject of the Adhyâsa of " 1-sense" is Jive and not the Antahkarana.
( safe gratara Fafraisi 2' 5987:) !
According to the Vedāntic view, the knowledge of supoumposed is unieal and only the knowledge of the absolute is cal and permanent. Thus the "1-sense," bemg superunposed, is not the real knowledge, like the erroneous knowledge of silver supeimposed on conchshell is no! Teal wod it is anirvacaniya, being different from permanent Teal and permanent unreal (Alika) both Here it is noteworthy that the emple of counchslicll-silver is not proper to be the example of illusory icality. the Praubhasika sattal, as scholais generally take it. To my mund, the conchi shell silver cxample appeals to be the example of phenomenal Teality (71981ffi a ). If we go through the process of orioncous knowledge of conch-shell silver, we find that the percicver of the crioncouS experience this is the silver ( 307 takes the conch shell silver as the phenomenal silver of which ornaments like ring or eat -1 ing can be inade of. But when the per ciever procceds on to pick up that silvei, hc finds that the silver is not there, and he sees mere couch shell those and thus he says that this is conch shell and not silver," the Vyāvahinika one. So, in this state of real knowledge of conch shell, the existence of the phenomenal silver is negated. In this analysis, tlicre remains no scope for illusory or pratibhäsika sattā at all. It is the phenomenal silver which is mistakenly perceived and so it is negated by him after the right knowledge of conch shell To support this view, Vimuktatman can be quoted, who says.
घ्यावहारिकस्यैव रजतस्य निराकृतत्वात् । (Istasiddhi)