Book Title: Microcosmology Atom in Jain Philosophy and Modern Science
Author(s): Jethalal S Zaveri, Mahendramuni
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 94
________________ 76 Microcosmology : Atom and non-corporeal (amūrta), they are deviod of sense-qualities of smell, taste, etc., and, therefore, imperceptible to the sense-organs and physical instruments. Immobile themselves they passively assist the motion or rest of mobile stationary objects; positive ether (dharmāstikäya) is the medium of dynamic state and the negative ether (adharmāstikāya) is that of the static state. Not even the minutest vibration is possible without the assistance of positive ether. Hence, where there is no ether, there is neither psychical nor physical existence. (3) ĀKĀŚĀSTIKĀYA (SPACE) According to the Jains, space is a real substance, because it satisfies the requirement of substance as well as a real. It is the container of all other substances. It is boundless/infinite. Ethers and other substances do not occupy the whole space as they are finite. That portion of space which is occupied by other substances is called loka (cosmos).' Loka is finite and is surrounded in all direction by aloka which is inert, empty pure space-a boundless void.2 Beyond loka, there is no object-animate or inanimate. Not a single tiny atom of matter nor a Jīva would be able to cross the boundary and go beyond the limit of loka Actually, the space is one indivisible entity. The ethers determine the boundary of the loka-ākāśa by their own finiteness. Before proceeding further, let us emphasize the utmost importance of the three reals mentioned above viz. Dharmāstikāya, adharmāstikāya and ākāśāstikāya (space). Dharmāstikāya and adharmāstikāya are mutually inter-penetrating and concomitant with loka-ākāśa. They are real constituents of the cosmos. Their existence and influence do not extend beyond the loka-ākāśa, but within cosmos they are all-pervading and co-extensive, Their separate existence cannot be inferred from their difference of locality as there is no such difference, but they have fundamentally different functions. In other words, they have a unity of locality with diversity of functions. Being devoid of physical qualities as well as consciousness, they can be distinguished by their respective functions. 1. Bhagavati Sūtra, 13-4-60. 2. Pravacanasāia, Pradīpikā Vrtti, 2-36.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266