Book Title: Jaina Gazette 1928
Author(s): Ajitprasad, C S Mallinath
Publisher: Jaina Gazettee Office

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 339
________________ 174 THE JAINA GAZETTE unconscious objects e.g., a pitcher etc., the knowledge, “I am a knower" would have been equally impossible in the soul, if it were essentially unconscious. It is in this way that the Jaina philosophers show how knowledge of objects would be impossible for the soul, if it be held to be essentially unconscious. Another argument, advanced by the Naiyayikas is as follows : "I am a knower,"—such a perception shows that the "I" and the "knowledge or consciousness " are separate ; for, if the perception. “I am a knower " proved that the "I" and "knowledge" were identical, the perception, “I am wealthy" would have proved also the identity of the "I" and "wealth." The Jainas contend that the perception, “I am a knower" does prove the identity of the “I" and "knowledge": for, if the soul were not identified with consciousness, the perception, "I am a knower," would have been impossible for itself. If the Naiyayikas contend that the soul, although essentially unconscious, becomes a knower, the Nyaya position itself is weakened thereby. The 'soul' is the substantive (Viseshya) and “knowledge' is the Adjective (Viseshana); when both the substantive and the adjective are perceived, we have the perception. “I am a knower ;"—this is the Nyaya theory, But how is this knowledge of the "I" and "knowledge " to be explained by the Naiyayika? The soul cannot have such perception, for according to the Nyaya theory, the soul cannot directly know itself. If it be held that the "T"and the "knowledge" are perceived by another piece of knowledge, the fallacy of Infinite Regression (Anavastha) becomes irresistible ; for, this another piece of knowledge is possible only when its Adjective "knowledge-hood" is perceived along with it ;--this again supposes a third piece of knowledge,—and so on. It is in this way that the cognition, "I am a knower" becomes impossible if the soul be not identified with consciousness. For this reason, the Jainas reject the theory of the Nyaya philosophy that the soul is essentially unconscious. The second Nyaya doctrine with regard to the soul is that it is eternally unchangeable i.e., absolutely immutable. The Jainas criticise this doctrine also and hold that the soul is subject Shree Sudharmaswami Gyanbhandar-Umara, Surat www.umaragyanbhandar.com

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502