Book Title: Jaina Gazette 1928
Author(s): Ajitprasad, C S Mallinath
Publisher: Jaina Gazettee Office

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 358
________________ ANTARIKSHA PARSVANATH CASE 193 the Swetambaris, with the counter-assertion, by themselves, of rights over the temple and the idol as extensive and as absolute as those put forward by the Swetambaris. Their case is to be found in the written statement of defendant No. 8, which was adopted as their own by the other delendants. In the course of that statement the charges of the plaintiffs with reference to the alleged mutilation of the idol by defendants are repudiated, and the views of the Digambaris with reference to the original form of the idol are put forward. With reference to these charges it may at once be stated that the plaintiffs' allegations as to the defendants' responsibility were not established at the trial, and their claim for damages, which was resisted by the defendants on the technical as well as on substantial grounds, has failed and is no longer persisted in. For the rest, the case presented by the written statement referred to was that the temple in question originally and absolutely belonged to the Digambari Jains, the Digambaris at Shirpur doing all the management, with the help and advice of other followers at Khamgaon and Karanja. The association between the two sects referred to in the plaint was stated to have been brought about by an invitation from the Digambaris to some respectable gentlemen from among the Swetambars to join in a committee of management under an arrangement which continued until 1908, when the Treasurer and Vice-President of the Committee, both Swetambaris, with a view of with-holding the entire wealth of this Digambari temple, had kept back the accounts which, when called upon, they had agreed to present ; in consequence of which conduct, as appears to be implied in the written statement, the association, itself originated by the Digambaris, came to an end at their instance. In confirmation of the assertion that the temple and the idol were Digambari, it was pointed out in the statement that the Deity in question was Digambari in its position, having been installed by a Jain Digambari King in a temple of Digambari style and construction, and that, itself a principal idol, it was surrounded by Digambari idols worshipped only by Digambaris. The Swetambari had never worshipped this deity with the chaksu and 25 Shree Sudharmaswami Gyanbhandar-Umara, Surat www.umaragyanbhandar.com

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502