Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 03 Author(s): A Ghosh Publisher: Bharatiya GyanpithPage 30
________________ (PART VD PAINTINGS AND WOOD-CARVINGS occasion of the contest, the author having been present at the disputation. Its date accordingly should be circa 1125, and the excellence of its workmanship accords well with the period of the finest pajlis belonging to the JinadattaSari group painted in Rajasthan. The Deva-Säri-Kumudacandra parh was most probably the work of a painter at the capital city of Patan which was the scene of the contest. In this metropolis, where the art of manuscriptproduction was greatly patronized, this event must have remained very much to the fore in the minds of the Svetāmbara community and the pathi was no doubt commissioned for being presented, also with some canonical text, to the triumphant Deva-Sari by one of his admiring followers. The difference in style between this pafli and those of the Jinadatta group is best accounted for by reason of the fact that they were painted in different areas resulting in the employment of different guild-artists. The processionscene in the parli depicting dancers and musicians, with their lively elongated figures, who accompany the ceremonial chariot with the image of Mahavira, is also indicative of high technical excellence in the production of painted Jaina book-covers at Patan in the first half of the twelfth century. There are several other paflis of later periods, namely the late twelfth and the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, but they tend to be increasingly hieratic and formal and lack the joie de vivre of meandering creepers with birds, animals and lotus-flowers, or the sedate charm of the Jinadatta group or the brilliance of the Deva-Sūri-Kumudacandra disputation. PALM-LEAP PERIOD Turning to the illustrations on the palm-leaf texts themselves, we have already noted that the earliest known example is dated 1060 (plate 265A). Thereafter we have a leaf of the Pinda-niryukri (a text on monastic rules) with a single well-drawn elephant, though the colour is rubbed (plate 270B). It is flanked by a formal lotus-medallion on either side. This manuscript was got written by one Ananda, son of a merchant, and presented to Yasodeva-Suri (1093-1123), a disciple of Muni Candra-Suri. It was a very common and esteemed practice for the Jaina laity to have canonical texts prepared and presented to the Jaina Acāryas who usually kept them in their Bhandaras. The very rich bankers and merchants donated even temples to the community, but both kinds of donations were equally efficacious in giving pious merit to the donor. Such a credo projects an interesting form of socialism which existed in the Jaina faith. The offerings of all devotees, whether humble or munificent, were equally meritorious. The writer of the manuscript is 402Page Navigation
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 ... 403