Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 03
Author(s): A Ghosh
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 198
________________ CHAPTER 36) The houses may, yet again, be classified under eight types: surya, vasava, virya, käläksa, buddhi, suvrata, präsäda and dvivedha. Each of these eight has sixteen varieties, and as such, the total number comes to one hundred and twenty-eight. ARCHITECTURE Apart from these, there is one more type of classification of houses specially meant for kings. It is the king only who is allowed to have a house round on plan, if he so likes. CONCEPT OF THE TEMPLE The Sanskrit words mandira and alaya, both denoting something like a shelter, specify the temple particularly in Jaina references, where, however, more ancient than these two is the word ayatana dating back to the time of Mahavira who often used to stay in Yakşayatanas in the course of his viharas; later it joined the compound word Jinayatana and was still later replaced by the words mandira, ǎlaya, geha, grha, etc. The concept behind the temple in Jainism is perhaps nowhere indicated. Essentially dedicated to one of the Tirthankaras, the temple, if it is taken to be a memorial, may win some logic, but surely not if is taken to be a funeral relic structure. But more logical does it seem to interpret the temple as the symbolic representation not of the Meru but of the samavasarana (below, p. 529) or the fascinating auditorium of the Tirthankara who, as one of those to be bowed before any one of the other Parameşthins, would deliver a sermon only inside the samavasaraṇa, whose idol was the first to appear and whose iconic symbol in the form of the mula-nayaka or main deity must be installed in the temple. Many a temple, whether ancient or modern, has in front the manastambha which is one of the component parts of the samavasarana (below, p. 530). The samavasarana, thus once symbolized as an architectural composition, even if a miniature one, lost its chance to be symbolized otherwise. Erroneous will it be to include the samavasaraṇa, which is absolutely indigenous to Jainism, amongst the funeral relic structures like stupa or aidūka, or even the jārūka or jālūka and ziggurat. Caitya, if it at all be referred to in this connexion, would support this contention. Both the words ayatana and caitya have the same meaning. The samavasarana being too complicated to be represented literally 1 'It can hardly be doubted that there exists some connection between temples and tombs', A.K. Coomaraswamy, History of Indian and Indonesian Art, New York, 1927, p. 47. Bhagavati-drådhand, Sholapur, 1935, p. 46. ⚫caityam ayatanamh tulye, Amar-akoşa, II, 2, 7. 501

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403