Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 03
Author(s): A Ghosh
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 159
________________ CANONS & SYMBOLISM (PART IX according to the Svetämbaras. Amongst the Digambara writers themselves there are a few differences the Tiloya-pannatti gives the nandyavarta for the seventh Jina, while the Pratistha-säroddhāra gives the svastika (agreeing with Hemacandra's Svetämbara tradition). The cognizance of the tenth Jina is the svastika according to the Tiloya-pannatti, but śri-druma according to the Pratisha-säroddhāra. The earliest literary source for lāñchanas in either of the two sects is later than the Digambara-Svetämbara separation. We must, therefore, take the help of archaeological evidence for the origin and development of the various lañchanas. Without going into much detail, it will be enough to state that no Jina image of the Kushan period shows any lañchana. The first datable and the earliest-known sculpture with a lañchana is the partly-mutilated sculpture of Neminātha from Rajgir, with a Gupta-period inscription referring to Candragupta. In the centre of the pedestal is the beautiful figure of a standing cakra-puruşa with the wheel on his back, and on either side of the wheel is a conch, the cognizance of Neminātha. The position of the lāñchana, according to Asādhara' (and all Jaina writers), is to be in the centre below the păda-pitha, while the attendant Yakşa and Yakşi are to be on the right and left sides respectively (of the pedestal). A noteworthy feature in Jaina iconography is the complete agreement in both the sects about the names of all the twenty-four Tirthankaras. Lists of the Tirthankaras are found in Agamas, e.g. the Kalpa-sūtra, the Logassasutta of the Avas yaka-sūtra and the Bhagavati-sūtra (16, 5). The Acărāngasūtra (sūtra 126) and the Niryukti thereon refer to the Tirthankaras of the past, present and future ages. The Sthānānga-sūtra (2, 4, 108) gives the complexions of the Jinas. The Digambara sect regards the nineteenth Jina Mallinātha as a male, while the Svetāmbaras believe that Malli was a female. The difference is due to the fact that the Digambaras believe that females cannot obtain mokşa. This belief seems to have grown because they cannot move about naked and practise the highest type of penance--the Jina-kalpa 1 First published by Ramaprasad Chanda in Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report, 1925-26, Calcutta, 1928, plate LVI b; U.P. Shah, Studies in Jalna Art, Baparas, 1955, fig. 18. (Above, p. 123, plate 53.-Editor.) Pratisha-sdroddhara, 1,77 : sthiretarárcayak padu-pithasyddho yathayatham, lachanam daksine päráve Yaksarh Yaksim ca vamakell 470

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403