Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 03
Author(s): A Ghosh
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 29
________________ . SINIATURE PAINTINGS fragmentary, texte illustrating a number of scene from the lives of Plakva nathasand Nominatha in which the convention of the projecting farther eye is for the most part almost amoticeablo (plate 271A, B, C, D), and yet the izietrations can hardly be earlier than the thirteenth century, One must also tever forget what is 180 frequently overlooked, namely that different artists belonging to one and the same period need not all have painted in the same style. Thus, a difference in style does not necessarily connote a difference in date or provenance. The well-known payt showing the war between Bahubali and Bharata, formerly in the possession of Sarabhai Nawabs and now in the collection of Kusum and Rajeya Swall of Bombay, has on its reverse the decorative motif of the meandering creeper with clephants, birds and mythical lions in roundels (col.-ills. 23A, B, C, D), It also belongs to first half of the twelfth century, though it is probably a little earlier than the inscribed paph, already referred to (plate 269A, B), which was made for the Jaipa pontiff Vijayasimhäcārya in the reign of Siddharaja Jayasimha (1094-1144). The provenance of the Bahubali parli is also likely to be Rajasthan, the main field of Jinadatta-Sari's activities, where, it seems, most of these early paflis of the Jaisalmer Bhapdāra were painted in the first half of the twelfth century. The Bahubali pafli is said to have originally been in a Jaisalmer Bhandara. One more patir of high importance and excellent workmanship remains to be considered in the group which forms the masterpieces of this form of Jaina painting and to which we have perforce restricted ourselves as the space at our disposal must be devoted to the most outstanding examples of Jaina painting on paflis, palm-leaf and paper. This pafli (col.-ill. 24), said to have come from a Jaina Bhandara, was formerly in the possession of the Jaina scholar Muni Jina vijayaji. It is now in a private collection. It depicts the famous disputation between the great Svetambara logician Vadideva-Süri and a well-known Digambara scholar Kumudacandra, at the court of Siddharaja Jayasimha in 1124 in which the former vanquished the proud Digambara savant. We have no doubt that it is to all intents and purposes a contemporary production and must have been painted within a year at the most from the date of the famous disputation which lasted six months and the story of which is not only recorded in Svetāmbara canonical literature but is also the plot of Yasascandra's drama Mudrita-kumudacandra. Yašaścandra was a dramatist of the time of Siddharāja Jayasimha (1094-1144) and the drama was written on the 1 Sourabhai Nawab, op. cit., plates O, P and Q fin colour). • Moti Chandra, op, els., figs. 199-203.... .:. fbido, flgs. 193-98. i. in 401

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 ... 403