Book Title: Jaina Art and Architecture Vol 03
Author(s): A Ghosh
Publisher: Bharatiya Gyanpith

Previous | Next

Page 139
________________ CHAPTER 33] INSCRIPTIONS In the interval Jainism was favoured by the Kalabhras and later under their political successors, the Pallavas and the Påndyas. The most important and perhaps the earliest extant monument is in the famous city of Kanci, known to have been a centre where all the religions flourished. This monument is a temple dedicated to Vardhamāna to which the people of the district made a grant of land in the reign of Pallava Simhavarman (early sixth century), the father of Simhavişnu. Various parts of this temple, except the central shrine, of which the date of foundation is not recorded, are referred to in later inscriptions." One of the earliest full-fledged monuments belonging to this period is referred to in the inscription from Kil-Sattamangalam in Wandiwash Taluk in North Arcot District. The monument, another temple, is no longer extant, but it existed in 743-44 in the fourteenth year of Nandivarman Pallavamalla. Another inscription from the same place belongs to the time of Pallava Kampa. varman (second half of the ninth century). It records the renovation of the palli and the pali, the construction of a mukha-mandapa for the paffi and a shrine for Iyakki-Padāri (Yakși-Bhajäri) and the gift of a big bell to the pallihall by Mädevi, the wife of Kadakadiyaraiyar, a feudatory of the Pallava king. The differentiation between palli, which was the name of the entire complex, and pali which is obviously derived from ancient pali of the Brāhmi inscriptions and should refer the resting-place of the ascetics, i.e. the monastery-a sophisticated development from the simple remote cave-dwelling of the early Jainas-is noteworthy. This palli is called Vimalasri-Arya-Tirtha-palli in an inscription of Cola Rājarāja I, from the same place. A similar instance can also be noticed in the Jaina Appăpdanātha temple at Tirunarungondai in South Arcot District. In the absence of the monument, the nature of the mukha-mandapa or the shrine (koyil) of Iyakki (Yakşi) cannot be known. The provision of a separate shrine for Yakşi-worship is, however, known from the Tiruppamalai (Pancapandavamalai, Walajah Taluk, North Arcot District) inscription referring to the cutting of the figure (pad imam) of the Poppiyakkiyar (Sanskrit Hema-Yakşi) in the fiftieth year (A.D. 780) of Nandivarman Pallavamalla. This is a rock-cut image, whereas the one from Kil-Sattamangalam is a structural temple. There is a still earlier reference to the Transactions of the Archaeological Society of South India, 1958-59, pp. 41 ff.; Annuat Report on Indian Epigraphy, 1958-59, appendix A, no. 10. South Indian Inscriptions, IV, nos. 363 and 368; Annual Report on South Indian Epigraphy, 1923, no. 98. * Annual Report on Indian Epigrapky, 1968-69, dos. B 219-25. • Epigraphia Indica, IV, 1896-97, pp. 136-37. 451

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403