Book Title: Grammar Of Apabhramsa Author(s): Madhusudan Mishra Publisher: Vidyanidhi PrakashanPage 51
________________ A Grammar of Apabhramśā (a) Sometimes the original roots are recognisable only by the first letter : d-ijja (be given), k-ijja- (be done), etc. These forms, however, had lost their passive force towards the end of Apbb. (b) The passive base like gheppa- (be taken) presupposes the Vedic gbạp from gặbh through metathesis of aspiration and voicing. 88. The forms, if made from jān (know), base jāņ-iaare; 3. jān-ia-i jān.ia-hi जाणिअइ जाणिअहिं 2. jān-ia-hi jān-ia-hu Erfurstfee जाणिअहु 1. jān-ia-ũ jān-ia-hũ जाणिअउँ जाणिअहुँ (a) In Awadhi the forms like dijjai suffered contraction : dijjā, etc. (b) The modal forms are rare. 89. In the last days of Apbh the passive base with -ijjahad lost its passive force, so that it had begun to be used as ordinary or simple verb. Thus lajjejja-was not more (or less) than lajj-, rakkh- ejja- was the same as rakkha-, and so on. 90. Simultaneously, we find the beginning of a new passive construction by the Apbh infinitive in -aņaha and the present forms of the verb jā (go): 37FUTE FT FTF (It can not be said), TFFTE FTS (It cannot be eaten), etc. (a) There is hyper-sanskritisation of this construction in the Purāņic and Buddhist texts written during this period : TOTIE 7 ufa=tera, 11 7 7 fa=n Pud, etc. 91. Still later, the passive construction had started by combining the past participle of the verb in question with jā (go): 2174 FT (It is eaten), etc.Page Navigation
1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80