Book Title: Comparative Study of Mantrashastra
Author(s): Mohanlal Bhagwandas Jhaveri
Publisher: Sarabhai Manilal Nawab

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 242
________________ SUBSEQUENT MANTRIKAS : SRI JINAPRABHASURI 233 the relations between the said Nizam-ud-din and Ghiy suddin Tughlag having been strained Nasir-ud-din might not have been on the best of terms with Sultan Mahomed Tughlaq especially because the latter was not interested in the propagation of the Islamic religion. This fact as well as the influence exercised by the Jains over him are borne out by the following extract from an article by Dr. A. B. M. Habibullah published in the issue of the 'Sunday Standard' dated 18th August 1940 A. D. "Not interested in the propagation of the Islamic religion, his belief in which was known to be shaky, he specially favoured the Hindu on a number of occasions. And a writer evidently belonging to the opposition, bitterly laments that the Sultan destroyed the best Mussalmans in India and replaced them by the 'infidels' whom he consistently patronised. Contemporary writers accuse him of not only inclining towards atheism but also to excessive intercourse with Hindu jogis and Brahmans; while evidence has come down to us, in the form of a Jaina Manuscript, of his active patronage extended to a distinguished Jain scholar named Simhakirti. *" Sri Jinaprabhasūri at the request of Sultan Mahomed also cured Sultānā Bālāde who was possessed by an evil spirit invoking Kșetrapāla Meghanāda for the purpose. He also secured control over sixty four Yoginis + (powerful female spirits) and obtained a boon from them that According to Firishta Mahomed Tughlaq desired that Shaikh Nasir-ud-din Chiragh -e-Delhi should attend upon him for personal service viz. dressing him, and imprisoned him on his refusal to do so and released him only when he agreed to perform the said service. * Perhaps Śri Jinasimhasūri is meant by this name. He was the preceptor of Sri Jinaprabhas īri who acquired considerable influence over Sultan Mahomed Tughlaq, The mistake might be due to the mistranslation of the Sanskrit manuscript due to which preceptor's name is given and the pupil's name is omitted. Epigraphia Carnatica Vol.88, pp. 377-78, inscription No. 46 however mentions Bhattāraka Simhakirti who was connected with Sultan Mahomed of Delhi. + The following are the names of sixty four yoginis given by Sri Jinaprabhasūri in his famous Vidhiprapă (composed in S. Y. 1363) a work on rituals for laymen and monks at pp. 116-117: Jain Education International 2010_03 For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376