Book Title: Chanakya Explored in Jaina Literature
Author(s): Nalini Joshi
Publisher: Firodaya Prakashan

Previous | Next

Page 213
________________ 203 kumbhakāra-śreņi, citrakāra-śreņi etc. [1.8.80 (p.382) od edn. ; 1.8.90 (p.390) Quid edn.]. The Jaina texts like Șațkhandāgama have used the word śreņi which suggests the spiritual status of an aspiror. The doctrine of guņaśreņi is found elaborately in the Șațkhandāgama (1st century A.D.) The term 'gana' in the Arthaśāstra possesses a common meaning i.e. “a group'. Kautilya refers ‘ksatriya' and 'śreņi' as the examples of samghas (republican states) but he does not recognize it as samgha-rājyas or gaņa-rājyas. (Hivargaonkar p.32) The reference of Ācārānga is extremely important in this matter because it presents a list of the modes of administration. The text runs as - अरायाणि वा गणरायाणि वा जुवरायाणि वा दोरज्जाणि वा विरुद्धरज्जाणि वा । (Ācārānga 2.12.1.7) The names of gañarājyas (republic states) are noted by the Indologists by the help of the Greek historians. Therefore the mention of gañarājyas in the Ācārānga is valuable. We find the example of dveirājya' (Prakrit-dorāyā) in the Avaśyaka-cūrņi, in which dual kingship of Candragupta and Parvataka is mentioned. The term “gaņa' is used in the Jaina history for a particular group of monks. There were eleven ganadharas who got instructions from lord Mahāvīra and divided these religious preachings into eleven anga-granthas. Furtheron, the Jaina mūlasmghas were divided into different ganas and gacchas. Here the word gana is used in its narrower sense. Thus the usage of the terms ‘gana' and 'samgha' goes back to the ancient political history of Magadha, Anga, Vanga and Kalinga. [7] Danda : There is no need to say that Kautilya is very much cautious

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257