Book Title: Applied Philosophy of Anekanta
Author(s): Shashiprajna Samni
Publisher: Jain Vishva Bharati Institute

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 32
________________ cease to exist at any time, it does not cease to exist at any time and it will not cease to exist at any time. It was, it is and it will be. It is constant, permanent, eternal, imperishable, indestructible, always existing.' The world is, Jamālī, non-eternal. For it becomes progressive (in time-cycle) after being regressive. And it becomes regressive after becoming progressive. The soul (i.e. living being) is, Jamāli, eternal. For it did not .cease to exist at any time. The soul is, Jamālī, noneternal. For it becomes animal after being a hellish creature, becomes a man, after becoming an animal and it becomes god after being a man." Several points may be noted in this connection. First, Jamālī was confused and remained silent in the beginning, for the question had several ambiguities. Mahāvīra stated that not only he could answer it but also most of his ordinary disciples could. (Was it an oblique reference to the 'silence' of the Buddha, when he first tried to avoid answering such question?) The question might have been ambiguous, but were not unanswerable. Secondly, in the first four avyākhyata questions, the subject was "loka". Since it ambiguously means both 'the world' and 'the person'.Mahāvīra used two separate sets of questions, with two different subjects, 'the world' and 'the soul', thus, perhaps foreshadowing the Jain ontological distinction between the living and the non-living (spirit and matter). Resolution of ambiguities is, as I have already noted, part of the vibhajya method. Third, and this is more important, Mahāvīra, unlike the Buddha, did not reject both of the seemingly contradictory predicates ('infinite' and 'finite'), but rather accepted both of Bhagavai Viāhapannattī. Ed. Mahāprajña, With Prakrit Text, Sanskrit renderings, Hindi translation and Critical annotations. Ladnun: Jain Vishva Bharati Institute. Vol. I, II, III, 1994, 9.23.233, Pupphabhikkhu, pp. 609-610.

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220