Book Title: Jain Thought and Culture Author(s): G C Pandey Publisher: University of RajasthanPage 29
________________ Emergence of Rational and Abstract Thought in the Jain Tradılion 19 tells,l? which hold that the file elements were alone real and thal things were composed of thein As said earlier, the element of scepticism prevailed in the more thoughtful from the Vedic times, but the period preceding Mahavira and Buddha was the right ccassion for growth of sceptical schools of thought and agnostic trends carried in from the time of Yajnavalky a 13 The period was being provided by the presence of diverse, conflicting and re-crconcılable theories perlaining to moral,metaphysical and religious beliels In the cusling turmoil, people became curious as to which View was true, and in the absence of a convincing solution became suspicious as to whether an view at all could br true The Brahma Jala-Sutla of the Digha Nikaya of the Buddhists refers to fifty eight schools of thought and Sutrakrtanga of the Janas mentions three hundred and sixty three schools of thought These illustrations, however, appear to be artificial, but the existence of four main schools of thought viz, Kriyavada Akriyavada Ajnanıkavada and Varnaylkavada cannot be denied 14 The philosophers of the limc formulated various doctrines of Kala, Isvara, Alma, Niyatı and Suablava attempting to provide an answer to the basic problein of the origin of the world They all denied manly power as a means to overcome Samsara However, they all believed in the doctrine of Rebirth, but differed about its cause Makkhali Gosala considers Niyatı to be the cause of Karman Another thinker of Akriyavada Purana Kassapa held that ethical distinctions between actions were unreal, because action itself was unreal Like Kassapa, Kaccayana also denied not the appearance, but the reality of action Thus the Ajivaka school accepted the process of Samsara giving it a new explanation, Kassapa and Kaccayana apparently Brahmanas denied the real existence of the problem itself Sanjaya Belathapulla was an agnostic thinker and believed that no knowledge could be had of the world process, soul or kar man and other related principles The philosophy of materialistic nihilism was expounded by Auta Kesakambalın 15 12 Sutrakrtangu, Sacred Books of the East, Taina Sutras, vol XLV pt II, p 343, 21 22 13 Yajnavalkya demonstrated rationally the impossibility of knowing the ultimate reality through the Neti Neti, doctrine an Illustration of rational agnosticism approaching Kantian agnsticism See KN Jayatilleke, op cit p. 109, 14 Sce, Sutrakriangu, op cit 16 27, 1 12 , 211, 22 79 15 For an elaborate discussion see, GC Pande, op cit pp 342 52Page Navigation
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195