Book Title: Jain Thought and Culture Author(s): G C Pandey Publisher: University of RajasthanPage 53
________________ The Riddle of Chanakya and Kautilya period As PC Bagchi, one of the greatest Indian Sinologist, has pointed out the name Huna itself came into existence in the Gupta age 129 In any case, the Hunas were certainly far beyond the geographical horizon of the Indians of the fourth century BC The Arthasastra also makes a reference to coral imported from Alexandria (2 11) Now, as pointed out by S Levi,30 according to Pliny and the Periplus the coral trade shifted to India in the first century AD In any case it appears certain that Alexandria, which was founded by AleXander only a few years before the accession of Chandragupta Maurya, could not acquire enough prominence as a sea-port by the close of the fourth century BC as to merit a reference in an Indian work of that period The Arthasastra (211) reference to Chinapata from Chinabhumi is also quite significant For, it is unlıkly that the Indians were aware of China as the land of silk in the fourth century BC Perhaps China had not acquired this name in that period Similar is the case of the Arthasastra (1111) reference to Parasamudraka According to the Periplus (first century AD) Palaesimunda was the name of Ceylon which the ancients called Taprobane Now, as Megasthenes and Asokan edicts actually knew this island as Tamraparni, it can hardly be maintained that an author of the fourth century BC knew it by the later name Parasamudra 31 Lastly, we would like to briefly mention some other considerations which point to a late date for the Arthasastra Firstly, while Kaulilya (26) prescribes the recording of the year, month, paksha and day in specifying dates in royal documents, Asoka nowhere follows this system Though an approach in this direction is seen in the Kushana records, the exact adoption of the rule of Kautilya is found for the first time in the Girnar inscription of Rudradaman 1 Secondly, the official language, contemplated in the Arthasastra (2 10) 18 Sanskrit, and not Prakritused by the Mauryas, the Satavahanas and the Kushanas Thirdly there is no reference in the Arthasastra to royal titles characterstic of the Maurya age On the other hand, Indra-Yama-sthananietat (1 13) cannot fail to recall Dhanada-Varunendrantaka-sama of 29 Bagchi, PC, India and Central Asia, p 137 30 Quoted in ABORI, XLVIII-XLIX, p 18 31 The reference to Kambu (Cambodia) and Vanayu (Arabia ?) also suggest that the geographical outlook of Kautilya was quite widePage Navigation
1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195