Book Title: Jainthology
Author(s): Ganesh Lalwani
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication

Previous | Next

Page 167
________________ only one sided picture of the fact or phenomena and thus create a false notion. According to the Jaina thinkers the onesidedness (ekānta) and the claim that my view is the only right view (agraha) are considered as false notions (mithyātva). For Buddha and Mahavira both, the true method of answering the philosophical questions is the method of analysis. Only an analytic approach towards the philosophical problems can give us a right vision. Both of them suggested that the philosophical questions should be answered after analysing them. This method of analysis was called as vibhajjavāda in both the canons. Buddha and Mahavira both claimed themselves as Vibhajjavadins. In Buddhist order at the time of Asoka only the Vibhajjavadins were considered as the true followers of Buddha. In Anguttarnikāya it is mentioned that there are four methods of answering a question-(i) answer to a question en-toto, i.e., absolutely (ekāṁśavāda), (ii) answer to a question after analysing it into various parts (vibhajjavāda), (iii) answer to a question by raising a new question and (iv) to keep silence.1 Buddha and Mahavira both preferred the second method, i.e., vibhajjavāda, though Buddha sometimes used the first, third and fourth methods also. It is mentioned in the texts that Buddha himself claimed as Vibhajjavadin. Prof. S. Dutt in his book 'The Buddha and Five After Centuries' says "perhaps the word Vibhajjavadin originally meant one whose method was to divide a matter posited into its component parts and deal with each part separately in his answer and not with the whole matter in en-toto fashion." This method of vibhajjavāda i.e. the method of analysis is well illustrated in Subha-sutta of the Majjhimanikaya. Subha asked Lord Buddha, 'whether busy life of a man of the world is to be preferred or a monk's reposeful life? Buddha answered-'the busy life may be a failure or success and so too the life of repose.' Similarly in the Jaina text Bagavati-sutra, Jayanti asked Mahavira whether sleeping is good or awakening is good? Lord answered that for a sinner sleeping is good and for a saint awakening is good. This analytic approach towards the problems shows that the relative answer is the proper method to deal with the problems, whether they are philosophical, religious, ethical or the problems of everyday life. Absolute or categorical answer explains only one aspect or the part of the problem and other aspects of the problem remain unexplained. Thus we can say that analytic approach towards the problems gives 1 Anguttara Nikaya, Vol. II, page 47. 130 JAINTHOLOGY

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294