Book Title: Jainthology
Author(s): Ganesh Lalwani
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication

Previous | Next

Page 178
________________ is real or unreal. If it is real, then it destroys the non-dual nature of Brahman and leads to an inevitable dualism. If it is unreal, then, this world which is caused by māyā will not be possible. To say that māyā is unreal and still it creates this world is as absured as to say that a woman is barren and that she is a mother. 47 And the Vedantins themselves accept the theory that the real thing (the world) cannot be produced from unreal thing.48 Again, the very statement that māyā is indescribable. i.e., neither existent nor non-existent on account of being existent in the state of mundane life and no more at the state of realisation, indicates that it is describable in terms of either existent on the phenomeal level or non-existent in the state of liberation. 49 To say that māya is indescribable is self contradictory like saying that I am dumb throughout the life and my father is bachelor. 50 If we grant that māyā exists, then where does it exists ? Neither Brahmam nor jiva can be locus of māyā. It cannot exist in the supreme Brahman which is pure-consciousness by nature. If it exists in Brahman then Brahman cannot be called pure-consciousness on account of being associated with māyā. Even individual self is pure consciousness by nature and in essence, not different from Brahman and thus free from all taint of māyā. If māyā is an independent reality like Brahman and co-eval with it from the beginningless time, then it will be an impossible task to annihilate it by any means of liberation ard the consequence of this indestructibility of māya is an eternal bondage of the Soul.51 It is argued that māyā exists (bhāvarūpa) but it cannot be eternal like Brahman nor can it be an indepenpent entity. Though it is not capable of being determined by logic, still the denial of its existence would be contradiction of a felt fact and without adopting this doctrine of māyā it is not possible to solve the problem of relation between the Absolute and phenomena, individual self and the Brahman, and Real and the unreal.52 Here, again, one may argue why should such kind of illogical and irrational concept be accepted at all ? Instead of postulating this kind of unreal principle as the cause of the world, it is better to accept the view that the world is both different as well se, 28, penisad with Goudapoderadamanjari, verse 13. 47 Anyayogavyavacchedika with Syadvadamanjari, verse 13. 48 Mandukyopanisad with Goudapadakarika and Sankarabhasya, Advaita prakarana, verse, 28, pp. 164- 65. 49 (a) N.K., part I, p. 63. (b) S.S.P., p. 8. 50 S.S.P., p. 8. 51 S.S.P., p. 9. 52 Suresvara, Sambaddhavartika, 175-181, pp. 55-57, ed. Kashinath Shastri, Agas pub. Anandasrama Press, 1892. JAINTHOLOGY, 141

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294