________________
348
THE INDIAN ANTIQUARY.
[DECEMBER, 1876.
these two sútras alone; in that in No. 10, have forms made up by the addition of another, that the termination given in the last sútra which necessitates the change of the vowel to is to be brought on to this, and not the one in its guna. Then he himself answers this by saythe previous sútra; and in No. 11 the rartika ing, "No, it should not be so taught, because explains to what the pronoun etayoh occurring we have such forms as budha and others," i.e. in V. 3. 20 refers.
forms made up by the addition of ka. On But let us examine the Bhashya more closely. III. 2, 123, the first two vártikas require that In the vårtikas on I. 2.1 Katyayana explains the use of the present tense (bhavanti) should that what Påņini means by saying that certain be taught in cases which the sátra is supposed terminations are for and he is, that before those not to include; in the last three, we are told terminations, those rules are to be applied to the that the sútra does extend to these cases also, preceding roots that are laid down with re- and reasons are given to show how it does. ference to such terminations as have actually | Patanjali has no adverse remark. got an indicatory or in them,-i.e. Påņini In all these instances, Katyayana simply attributes the properties fora or fin to those gives an anvākhyana or explanation of the siltras, terminations, though they have not got or in and Patanjali agrees with him; and such inthem. Before coming to this conclusion, how- stances may be multiplied to any extent. Of ever, the author of the vårtikas refutes three other course, it is not to be denied that often there ways of taking this and the following sútiks that are adverse criticisms on Påņini, and that.Pamay be suggested. Kâtyâyana then gives reasons tanjali defends him and refutes Katyayana, i.e. why it is attributed to some terminations, makes pratyákhyána as well as vyakhyána of and free to others, and why one same property the vartikas. But Patanjali not seldom refutes fairy or for is not mentioned with regard to all. Paņini also, i.e. makes pratyákhyana of the súIn all this Patanjali confines himself to a de- tras, the expression अयं योगः शक्योऽवक्तुम् occurtailed explanation of the vartikas, and there is no ring pretty often. On the other hand, he often refutation of any one of them.
says with regard to the vartikas, तस्मात्सप्पच्यते, &c. On I. 4. 14 there is only one vdrtika in which To show the nature of the Great Commentary Katyayana explains why the word anta is used generally as regards this subject, I will bere give in the sútra, and infers that in other sútras a short analysis of a portion of the Bhashya on
a short analysis of a in which technical terms are defined, those terms the angádhikára in the order in which the sktras signify only the terminations that may have been occur there, not here selecting my instances. mentioned, and not the words ending with those 1. 8684 VI. 4. 1. K. settles the meaning of terminations --- .e. for instance, ghasignifies only the terminations tara and tama, and not gauri
the gen. Er; Pat, does not refute. K. gives tara or gauritamı. Patanjali does not make the objects of the angadhikara, and says that any adverso remark, but explains the vdrtika. they may be attained otherwise than by having On III. 1. 134, Katyayana remarks that the last such an udhikára. Pat. agrees, while Kaiyata termination ach must be stated generally as re-establishes that adhikara. applicable to all roots, because there are 2. In . VI. 4.2, K. raises an objection and sach forms as bhava and stva. Why, then, answers it. Pat. accepts this explanation, but does Pâņini lay down the gaña Pached proposes also another. others, and teach the addition of the termi- 3. In af VI. 4.3, K. justifies the use of nation to those roots ? Katyayana himself tells TH for afH; Pat. does not refute. us, it is because in this way be may be able to 4. FACTORT &c. VI. 4. 12. K. in the vartikas add some indicatory letter or anubandhas to explains this sátra in a manner to avoid the some of the roots, and to prevent the appli: lengthening of the penultimate vowel of 757 cation of special rules to others. On the next necessitated by the sitra Jan &o. VI. sitra the author of the vártikas remarks that 4. 15. the termination ka should be taught as ap- 1 5. a &c. VI. 4. 14. K finds frult; plicable to the roots indicated in the sútra, Pat. agrees. only when they have a preposition prefixed; 6. 5AT &c. VI. 4. 16. K. finds fault, not for when without a preposition, the roots explicitly but tacitly. Pat. avoids the objection
