Book Title: Hathigumpha Inscription of Kharavela and Bhabru Edict of Asoka
Author(s): Shashi Kant
Publisher: D K Print World

Previous | Next

Page 66
________________ 40 The Häthigumpha Inscription and the Bhabru Edict It is generally accepted now that the Maurya Empire disintegrated soon after the death of Asoka in c. 235-234 BC. His grandsons Dasaratha, Samprati and Vigatāśoka seem to have divided the empire among themselves with their centres respectively in Magadha, Ujjayini and Gandhāra. Jalauka, a son of Asoka, also seems to have become independent in Kashmir. Taking advantage of the internecine feuds among the successors of Asoka, some of his servants also appear to have carved out independent principalities. The examples seem to be furnished by the founder of the Sātavāhana line in the Nasik region and the founder of the Cedi line in the Kalinga region. According to Prof. K.A.N. Sastri, 'the exact date of the foundation of Sātavāhana power cannot be determined, but the puranic lists suggest that the first king, Simuka, probably began to reign about 230 Bc'.' Dr. K. Gopalachari more surely places the event soon after Asoka's death in c. 235 BC.? The Sātvāhanas have been referred to as 'Andhrabhrtya' which further suggests that the founder of the line was a servant of the Maurya emperors, perhaps of the rank of a Mahāmātra (member of the Imperial Service) and holding a Commissioner's or Governor's charge in the region where he proclaimed his independence, and that he originally belonged to the Andhra region. In no other way the Sātavāhanas appear to be connected with Andhra; all their possessions were confined to the western coast and only a very late epigraph of the 24th or 26th ruler is 1. 2. Op. cit., p. 89. A Comprehensive History of India, II, pp. 293-328. Gurty Venkat Rao's view placing Simuka in 271 bc is highly improbable. No such thing could be thought of in the hey-day of Maurya imperial power under Asoka. The political geography available in hs also discounts such a hypothesis. (Rao in The Early History of the Deccan, pt. I-VI, pp. 90ff.). Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya has discussed the controversy as regards the home of the Sātavāhanas in the Journal of Indian History, XLI, 3, (December 1963), pp. 749-55. He also holds that the Sātavāhanas were migrants to the Maharashtra region. in The Early Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196