Book Title: Hathigumpha Inscription of Kharavela and Bhabru Edict of Asoka Author(s): Shashi Kant Publisher: D K Print WorldPage 76
________________ 50 The Häthigumphā Inscription and the Bhabru Edict who bore him a child in the seventh year (L 7) and Queen Sindhulă of Simhapatha (L 15). Since the latter is mentioned with the title of Queen, she appears to be identical with Agamahisi of the Svargapuri record. The location of Svargapuri is in accord with the description of Sindhulā's shrine given in our inscription and this seems to confirm the identification. We thus gather that the Chief Queen of Khāravela was named Sindhulā, she hailed from Simhapatha, she was the daughter of King Lalāka Hathisiha, and she followed the religion of her husband. Khāravela refers to her dedication of a shrine, which appears to be confirmed by her own Svargapuri record wherein she is said to have built Arahamta-prāsādam, i.e., a shrine in the honour of Arahaṁta for worship-purpose, as well as leņań, i.e., cave-dwelling for Sramaņas (ascetics). The opening of the epigraph with the Jain hymn of obeisance, makes its author definitely a follower of Jainism. It is also confirmed by the fact that the dates mentioned are in M.E., as we have seen above. He calls himself pūjānurata-uvāsaga, i.e., ‘a lay devotee addicted to worship’. The four-fold Jain congregation consists of monks, nuns, male lay devotees and female lay devotees, and his description of himself is thus in accord with the traditional concept. The description of the assembly is also essentially Jain. But he was not intolerant or fanatic. Nowhere does he disparage, criticise or show disrespect to other religions. In fact, he takes pride in calling himself as Sava-pāsaņda-pūjako (worshipper of all sects) and sava-devāyatana-saṁkhārakārako (embellisher of all temples) (L 17); and at the Savagahanań ceremony in Mathura he worshipped the Arahasta and at the same time gave gifts to the Brahmins (L 9). This catholicity of The terms Arahamta and Sramana have distinct connotation. Arahamta is the reverenced (pujya) deity who has cast off transmigration and is no longer a mortal; Šramana is a revered recluse or ascetic who is a mortal like us but deserves respect for going homeless in pursuit of spiritual attainment. B.M. Barua confused the two terms in his translation cited on p. 31 supra. For Private & Personal Use Only Jain Education International www.jainelibrary.orgPage Navigation
1 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196