________________
U DDESA 21
सवृत्तिकः कविदर्पणः
real name is Candrāyaṇa, which is given by the Chandaḥkośa v. 32 to a couplet of stanzas in the Doha and the Kaminimohana metres and which may then have been transferred from the couplet to its 2nd constituent. See my remarks on the name Dvipadi at Vṛttajātisamuccaya, Introduction, para 5. The name Samgataka given by Virahanka (VJS. 4.64-65) to a strophic couplet was apparently transferred to its first constituent as seen from the Samgataka metre of Hemacandra at Chandonuśāsana 2.265, in a similar manner. The commentator supplements the author and defines other metres of the same class. Thus Hela has a Saņmātra followed by 4 Caturmätras, of which the 2nd and the 4th must be either Madhya-guru or Sarvalaghu. Adhikākṣarā has 5 Caturmatras, of which the 2nd and the 4th must not be Madhya-guru, followed by a Pañcamātra in a Pāda. This metre is defined by Virahanka at VJS. 4.24 and by Hemacandra at Chandonuśāsana 4.69. Mañjarī has 2 Trimātras, 3 Caturmātras and 1 Trimātra at the end in each Pada; Aravindaka has 1 Ṣaņmātra, 1 Pañcamātra, 1 Caturmätra, 1 Trimātra and 1 Dvimātra in succession in a Pāda. These four metres are said to belong to the Paddhatikā class of metres, while the two metres of the Khanda class are Upakhanda and Khaṇḍitā. The former has in its Pādas 1 Ṣaņmātra, 1 Caturmātra and 1 Trimātra, while the latter has 1 Ṣaņmātra followed by 2 Caturmatras in a Pāda. The five metres which belong to the class of Madanavatāra are, as the commentator mentions, Madhukari, Navakokilā, Kāmalilā, Sutārā, and Vasantotsava which have respectively 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 Pañcamātras in each of their Pādas. These metres are defined by Hemacandra at Chandonusasana 4.75.
139
V. 23: 'A pair of Pañcamātras, a pair of Caturmātras and a Trimātra make (the Pāda of) a Galitaka; a pair of Trimātras, 3 Caturmätras, a Trimātra and a long letter (at the end) make (that of) a Khañjaka, and 5 Caturmātras followed by a short and a long letter make (that of) a Rāsaka.' All these four names have been treated as common names by the poets and prosodists as the commentator tells us. Thus the Pādāntya Yamaka was considered as a peculiarity of the Galitaka, as specifically mentioned by Virahanka at VJS. 4.106 after defining several Galitakas in vv. 89-105. Hemacandra refers to this as a view of 'some' in his commentary on Chandonusāsana 4.40. Pādāntya Yamaka and Anuprāsa were the characteristics of a Khañjaka according to our commentator, but Hemacandra's directions at Chandonuśāsana 4.41-42 com. are that a Khañjaka has the Anuprāsa, but not the Yamaka, even though all his illustrations of the Khañjakas
