________________
10. Ibid. p. 49. 11. Ibid. pp. 44, 48, 56, 60. 12. Ibid, pp. 42, 52. 13. H. Lüders, Bruchstücke, pp. 49, 55. 14. Cf. Cappellers catalogue S.V. 15. H. Lüders, Bruchsiūcke, p. 60. 16. Hemacandra permits also yy, cf. Pischel, Gramm 289. 17. H. Lüders, Bruchstücke, p. 59 18. cf. my treatrise in Gzech, p. 10 19. Festschrift of Ernst kūhnp. 301. Observation 20. In this place I desist from supplying the interesting information about the stages of the
individual Prākrit dialects in Bhāsas dramas, since it did not contribute any thing to the
fixation of the date of Bhäsa. 21. For denouncity this theory one should refer to the researches, which Prof. Ernst Windisch
has embodied in his treatise Uber den sprachlichen characterdes Pāli in the proceedings of the XIVth. International Congress of Orienatalist, Vol. I, Sect. I (Paris 1906), p. 252, f.
cf. also H. Luders : Bruchstucke, p. 61f. 22. H. Lüders: Bruchstucke, p. 64. For this question the literature has been cited by Pischel
in his Gramm 32. 23. J.S. Spever : Studies about the Kathāsaritsăgara. Verhandelingen for koninglijke Akademie
van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam. Afdeeling Letter Kunde, Nieuwe Reeks. Deen VIII. No. 5, p. 51, f. cf. also A Hillbrandt ZDMG. Vol. 69 (1915), p. 363 and Hertels objection
ZDMG, Vol. 70 (1916), pp. 133. ff. 24. The problem about the age of Bhāsa has been discussed also by J. Jully in his treatise
Kollaktaneen zum Kautilyas Arthasastra-Nachrichten non der konigl. Gesellschaft der Wisenschaften Zu Gottingen, 1916, p. 353 and I feel happy to have been successful in providing new evidences to his fixation of the date (3-4 century after Christ), which he expressed in a sceptical manner.
TAH 4511 3 Tor of
factore, 2002 D
-
121
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
