________________
Vol. XXII, No.-2
2. Distinctions (i) The theory has limitations. It Though it was originated for phimostly refers to physical pheno- losophic issues, but it has applicamena
tions in moral and spiritual world besides physical phenomena. It is
wider in scope (ii) The theory has only 2-aspectal In it, the inference is examined description. Uncertainty princi- with 7-aspectal approach verifiable ple has added a third dimension statistically and quantum mechani(Verifiable)
cally. It goes deeper into reality
and advanced over Relativity (ii) Relativity concept may be It indicates the limit of rational improved and is not the lemit of knowledge through its predication knowledge
of indescribablity (iv) It is intellectual, mathemati- It is intuitional and subjective cal, logical and verifiable theory construct of experience and wisIt was postulated during 1905-15 dom. It was postulated carlier than
527 B.C. 3. Dis-similarities (i) It is biased more towards It is biased more towards metaobservable phenomena, though physical/philosophical world. It mind-matter relationship is invol- reflects strong mind-matter relaved
tionsbip It may be extended to
physical reality (ii) The unification of natural The intuitional insights can not be Jaws may be mathematicised in mathematicised. Its logic did not volving micro-and macro-world encourage quantitative observa
tions. However, some modern scholars have tried to express Anekantavada in different mathematical forms: Statisfically (i) 3 C, +3C, + 3 Cg
=7 Holistically (ii) + 00 S P. ap=T=O
(P=asspects or Standpoints) T=truth, O=
Inexpressible) (iii) -00 S7 P. dp=T=24
(where 24 parameters are virtually insolutlity).
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
