________________
IX, 4, 1. ON EXCLUSION FROM THE PÂTIMOKKHA. 313
charged) does not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord (of the assembly)?'
[Same as last, reading ‘not submit himself to the legally (prescribed) concord of the assembly, &c., instead of abandon the precepts,' &c.]
7. And how (can it be legally said that the person charged) withdraws his acceptance of the legally (established) concord (of the assembly)?'
[Same as last, reading withdraws his acceptance,' &c., for does not submit,' &c.]
8. “And how can it be legally said that the person charged has been seen or heard or suspected of having committed an offence against morality . . . . an offence against conduct .... an offence against doctrine ?'
[Same as § 4, reading 'offence against morality,' &c., for · Pârâgika offence.']
These are the ten kinds of the inhibition of Pâtimokkha which are legal.
Here ends the First Portion for Recitation.
1. Now the venerable Upali? went up to the Blessed One, and bowed down before him, and took his seat on one side. And when he was so seated, the venerable Upåli said to the Blessed One :
When a Bhikkhu, Lord, intends to take upon himself the conduct (of any matter that has to be
No doubt in his rôle of a chief of the Vinaya-dharas, as in Mahâvagga IX, 6, &c.
Digitized by
Digitized by Google
