________________
PA!
?
2016
I presume you all no! 7 stiisi Piusmony 1,!1 # f178 with your bulvidord thry Pilo mi pom
The plo? o! o no slirincissimas arent lor $7* cedurt of Jusuco. TWE" ?!"ht pior Profession from acrsiy. Lord italijurta 1.4.11np} :'?£*
! argument of idk minty of "c*!?!.
Lordi Buidhi ha's furi10: ?! mon ames for smago yun!!!
Lord Malous Wasdrogues :79, a to $141 Ur.l. 31 wollare or all livin' $34102035 Grutom nshel, W
y ronn /!17!, ! *Non-violpaca'
Whose protection is simedat sy myy of non-violence, sire ?
'Protection of all cresiune,
*Popction of ៦ ៧វព៖ nូតា; } *: • ? ៤ ៤ព1 ។ low How can all by petos?
'In the pitcher of non-violence an: one hole of crinity is loft Then alone it holds the warnir of equanimity."
Whom to convey tho mes9750 o 22-violenco, siro?
'To all and sundry, be they waking or asleep, in this proximity of oxistence or away from it. loading "Ids existenco or otherwise, 3cquisitive or non-acquiciil'c, croving for bondago or deliverance.
This message of non-violence conduces to 3 universal wellaro. Hence disseminate it overywhore, 1
Lord Mahavira's orientation was towards cxistence hence individual distinctions nover bared his progress. The individualist priests protected the interests of the bourgeois Their code was multi-pronged for the rich it had one set of norms, and for the poor another The highplaced ought to realize service and the low-placed offer to them their service and suffer their excesses Religion patronised this system Lord Mahavira discarded it as patently bad Said he, 'It is a clumsy attempt to protect the vested interests of the high-born it
1
Ayaro', 4/3, 4
