________________
SACRED LITERATURE OF THE JAINS
227
akkhaliya (v. 3) tti,1930 gäha. We have here then a very incomplete quotation of the text, see above p. 55-In vv. 30-38 there are special statements in reference to the 11 karamas, the fourth of which is here called thiviloyaṇam. See p. 414. In v. 40 we find a division of the suam into baddham and abaddham. The former is explained by duvālasaṁgaṁ and called nisiham and anisiham (see pp. 452, 553); the nistham is explained as pacchannam, and the following added in illustration:- nistham nama jaha 'jjhayanam (v. 41). In verse 42 we find a citation from pūrva 2-see above p. 354-in immediate conjunction with the foregoing.
11. Cauvtsatthai, 62 (61 BP) vv., second ajjhayanam in Haribh. Stands alone in Peterson's Palm-leaf 77°.
12. Vandananijjutti, 191 (189π B, 190 P) vv., equivalent to the third ajjh. of Har. Stands alone in Peterson's Palm-leaf No. 77d. From v. 36 on there is a dialogue between guru and co° codaka, see above p. 34. After v 176 we read in the text atra sūtram, and Har. quotes a text which begins with the words icchāmi khamāsamaṇe vaṁdium.
13. paḍikkamaṇanijjutti, 54 (52 PB, 51m) vv. Chap. 13-18, which correspond to the fourth ajjh. of Haribh., presuppose a [70] pratikramanasütram101 given by him in full in sections. These chapters form a species of running commentary to each of the sections of the pratik. Chap. 14, 15 take up one section each, chap. 17 two, chap. 13, 16 contain the explanation of several sections. The sections explained in chap. 13 read :- paḍikkamāmi egavihe asaṁjame p. dohim bamdhanehim, p. tihim damḍehim, p. caühim jjhanehim. The entire following chapter is an explanation of the latter sentence. In a dhammajjhāṇaṁ of 69 vv. precedes these sections commented upon in chapter 13.
14. jhanasayam, dhyanasatakam, 106vv. The last verse (106) which is omitted by Haribhadra, mentions only 105 vv,, and states that
1030 akkhaliasambiai vakkhanacaükkae darisiammi suttapphäsianijjuttivittharattho imo hoi // schol. tatra 'skhalitapadoccaraṇam samhita, athava paraḥ samnikarṣaḥ samhita (a fine Brahminical reminiscence /).. padam, samhita padartha, padavigraha, calana, pratyavasthanam (see above p. 38) are here referred to.
1031 It begins icchāmi paḍikkamiuṁ..; it is in prose and different from the śraddha-or śrāvaka-pratikramanasutra, whose 50 gathas, divided into 5 adhikaras, were commented in Sarhvat 1496 (A.D. 1440) by Ratnasekhara from the Tapagaccha (No. 52 in Klatt). In Peterson's Palm-leaf MSS. there are two other similar texts, & pratikramaṇasutram 86e 83c (where it is called aticaraprat) and a pratikramanam 154a (see p. 125b), which is different from the first.
