Relation Between Religion And Philosophy

Author(s): Jitendra S Jetly
Publisher: Jitendra S Jetly

Page 16

him. Otherwise regarding #TOFTA, 197169 #13 is clear in his mind. He frankly states that इह तु आत्मादितत्त्वज्ञानं तत्त्वज्ञानम् and by this तत्त्वज्ञान one achieves निःश्रेयस् and not the afast of all the categories which are eunmerated in the 1st phorism by 3TT TT. The author of Fragt is also quite clear in his mind regarding the achievement of 197 and states दु:खजन्य प्रति दोष मिथ्याज्ञान.नामुत्तरोत्तरापाये तदनन्तरापाया दपवर्गः। Thus the establishment of the science of reasoning may be useful to some extent to prove the metapbisical elements of different philosophical systems but for the sake of achieving 19 may be verỳ few perhaps the knowlege of self only is useful. The sister system Vaid’esika and other systems too have accepted this FUTETTE to prove their own principes. As the Vais’esika system accepts the categories of the Ferra the Nyāya system on the other hand accepts the seven categories of the Vait’esika system.
: However, the Vaiž’esika system had tried to enter the world of physical science to some extent. Of course, all the so called realistic Indian phi osophical systems have poked their nose in the world of physical - science. None of them had any idea of testing their assumed principes concerned with physical elements in any scientific laboratory. They had presupposed ceatain elements, in their minds and then they tried to prove them by their selected logic. So the Vajs'esika system though accepts seven categories, the later four viz. Ha, Faeroe
#919 and 37H17 are the categories, of their imagination unwarranted by fact and reality. Many cther philosophical systems do not accept these later four categories. Even from three categories certain द्रव्यs like आकाश काल दिशा