Relation Between Religion And Philosophy

Author(s): Jitendra S Jetly
Publisher: Jitendra S Jetly

Page 19

18 ferentemente pentru a: gr: 1 मतमेतत्प्रकटित तत औलूक्यमुच्यते ॥ अनपावेन ऋषिणा रचितत्वात्त यौगिकम् ।
आक्षपादमिति ख्यात प्रायस्तुल्यं मतद्वयम् ॥ Thus between para and def systems there was not much difference except in the number of gaITS. It is certain that in older days these systems had their religious followers as described above.
Next we turn to that system. By HAI here we mean पूर्व मीमांसा system of जैमिनि. As aryans were much more connected with performance of Vedic sac.ifices the gå afar system seems to be one of the older systems, discussing the interpretation of different Vedic sentences in connection with their injunctions. In fact, this system teaches us the science of interpretation. To be in line with other philosophical system it discusses the nature of self etc. but it is not its main function. It is more connected with different sacrifices to be performed to achieve different aims.
It is also connected with certain नित्यकर्मs like सन्ध्या , fra att etc. God is not the important entity in this system. कर्मेति मीमांसका: i.e. कर्म is the main important entity. In the realm of Indiau philosophical systems except cārvāka it is the only system which does not discuss AT&T seriously as the ultimate aim of life. The system is studied mainly to learn the science of interpretation than to study any metaphysical elements like self, God etc. It does not mean that it has no such