Book Title: Nyayamanjari Part 02 Author(s): Jayant Bhatt, Chakradhar, Gaurinath Shastri Publisher: Sampurnand Sanskrit Vishva VidyalayPage 28
________________ ( 11 ) Having discussed the Grammarian's theory of a qualified knowledge with word as an attribute and import as a substantive in the content, Jayanta takes up for discussion the fundamental proposition, namely, all the objects of the world are transformations of the one indivisible Word-Principle. The Grammarian, as we have already seen, opines that the cognition of an object without a verbal association being an impossibility, objects should be regarded as mere transformations of word. Jayanta thinks that this argument of the Grammarian is hardly convincing and satisfactory. Every object is endowed with many an attribute and it is word which helps us in understanding only one such attribute. There is, therefore, no justification for the belief that word is superimposed on its import or that word assumes transformation in the form of what is signified by it. Jayanta draws instances from our daily life to establish his point. Thus, he says that the sunbeam or the sense-organ or the lamp is regarded as the instrument of the cognition of objects, but, we never say that any one of them is superimposed on the object revealed by it. If that is so, will it not be perfectly unjustified to say that word which is not anything but a medium for the cognition of an object is identical with it? Jayanta does not see any reason why the case of word should be considered to be a special one. So he boldly denies the possibility of a case of superimposition as maintained by the Grammarian. The Grammarian might say that the non-distinction between word and import is due to the impression that the same form stands for both. To be explicit, the same form 'cow' stands for the word 'cow' and the cow-concept. And, it is this sameness of form which makes us think that the two are identical. But, Jayanta says that the impression of sameness of form in both the word and its meaning is totally false. He quotes from Kumārila'sPage Navigation
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 ... 384