Book Title: Jaina Theories of Reality and Knowledge
Author(s): Y J Padmarajiah
Publisher: Jain Sahitya Vikas Mandal

View full book text
Previous | Next

Page 206
________________ CHAPTER VI 187 treats dravya and paryāya (guna) as external or independent' entities. This is why Gunaratna describes this view as : kāņādayaugābhyupagata-parasparaviviktadravyaparyayaikānte, etc.?, although it considers dravya as the substratum (aśraya) of the gunas. The Vaiseșika is the author of this view although it is falsely fathered upon the Jaina also by the Buddhist logicians, Arcața and Durveka.' As a matter of fact, the Jaina thinkers themselves, viz., Siddhasena, Abhayadeva, 1. Cf.: "Though thus dependent upon a dravya, they (guņas) are conceived as altogether distinct from it, for they can by themselves be known and as such must, according to the doctrine (the Nyāya-Vaišeşika) be independent realities. They are what they are in complete independence of everything including the dravyas to which they belong....”OIP, p. 232. See also TS, p. 82 (notes), where the gunas are characterised as 'accidents' attaching to substance, the Ens. 2. TRD, p. 231. See also the following f.n. 3. In course of our treatment of ubhayavāda only the Vaiśesika (the kāņāda) is referred to as the author of the theory, although the Naiyāyika (the yauga) also shares this view in important essentials. Curiously enough Arcata chooses the Jaina as the main target of his criticism against this ubhayavāda in his Dravyaparyayayor anekantavada-khandana HBT, pp. 104-107 (and the Aloka thereon), particularly the kās. 20, 25 and 24. The first two of these kās. have been quoted (infra) and the last one hints that the dravyaparyāyavāda would not be different from accepting a mixed view of kūtasthanityată in regard to dravya and kşananāśita in regard to paryāya, together. (As a matter of fact Ratnakirti categorically affirms that there can be no third possibility beyond the alternatives of kşanikatva and akşanikatva in this regard : kşanikakşaņikaparihāreņa rūsyantarābhāvāt....p. 77, SBNT). The criticism of the Vaiśeșika view, however, follows immediately the attack on the Jaina. Siddhasena firmly repudiates the falsity (micchättam) of the Vaiseșika position in gā. 49, STP, p. 656. Although the 5. Sia Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444